Hearings on Legislation to Outlaw Certain Un-american and Subversive Activities: Hearings...H.R. 6903 and 7595. March 1950 |
도서 본문에서
62개의 결과 중 1 - 5개
2109 페이지
... Association for the Advance- ment of Colored People 2296 Testimony of Mrs. Alexander Stewart , Women's International League for Peace and Freedom .... 2302 May 4 , 1950 : Testimony of Simon Federman , American Federation for Aid to ...
... Association for the Advance- ment of Colored People 2296 Testimony of Mrs. Alexander Stewart , Women's International League for Peace and Freedom .... 2302 May 4 , 1950 : Testimony of Simon Federman , American Federation for Aid to ...
2113 페이지
... association , trust , foundation , or fund ; and includes a group of persons , whether or not incorporated , permanently or temporarily associated to- gether for joint action on any subject or subjects . ( 3 ) The term " Communist ...
... association , trust , foundation , or fund ; and includes a group of persons , whether or not incorporated , permanently or temporarily associated to- gether for joint action on any subject or subjects . ( 3 ) The term " Communist ...
2123 페이지
... association , movement , or group or combination of persons . ( 3 ) The term " to contribute funds or services " includes the rendering of any personal service and the making of any gift , subscription , loan , advance , or deposit , of ...
... association , movement , or group or combination of persons . ( 3 ) The term " to contribute funds or services " includes the rendering of any personal service and the making of any gift , subscription , loan , advance , or deposit , of ...
2136 페이지
... Association to examine this bill , and he wrote a very lengthy opinion in which he states he considers it constitutional . Dr. SCHMIDT . I think a majority of the constitutional lawyers are inclined to believe , because it is so ...
... Association to examine this bill , and he wrote a very lengthy opinion in which he states he considers it constitutional . Dr. SCHMIDT . I think a majority of the constitutional lawyers are inclined to believe , because it is so ...
2152 페이지
... Association , in ably reasoned opinions , have expressed belief in the constitutionality of S. 2311 , a counterpart of H. R. 7595 , and based upon the earlier H. R. 5852. These abundantly qualified attorneys have supported their ...
... Association , in ably reasoned opinions , have expressed belief in the constitutionality of S. 2311 , a counterpart of H. R. 7595 , and based upon the earlier H. R. 5852. These abundantly qualified attorneys have supported their ...
자주 나오는 단어 및 구문
action Activities Control Board amendment American Legion American Veterans Committee Attorney believe bill of attainder Chairman citizens Civil Rights Congress clear and present COMMITTEE ON UN-AMERICAN communism Communist organization Communist Party Communist political organization Communist-front organization Congress constitutional crime criminal democracy democratic employees enactment espionage establishment existing fact Father PARKER Federal FEPC final order foreign government freedom of speech front organizations groups HARRISON hearing individual KEARNEY labor legislation MCSWEENEY membership ment Moulder Mundt-Nixon bill munist NIKOLORIC Nixon bill officer opinion opposed organiza overthrow penalties person political party present danger Progressive Party prosecution protect provisions punishment purpose question reason registration statement representative section 14 sedition Senate Smith Act statement or annual statute subversive Subversive Activities Control Supreme Court TAVENNER testimony tion totalitarian dictatorship UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES unconstitutional Union United unlawful VELDE violation WALTER world Communist movement
인기 인용구
2324 페이지 - ... the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market, and that truth is the only ground upon which their wishes safely can be carried out.
2316 페이지 - The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to SCHNEIDER V.
2217 페이지 - Accordingly a function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger.
2324 페이지 - While that experiment is part of our system I think that we should be eternally vigilant against attempts to check the expression of opinions that we loathe and believe to be fraught with death, unless they so imminently threaten immediate interference with the lawful and pressing purposes of the law that an immediate check is required to save the country.
2324 페이지 - If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union, or to change its republican form, let them stand, undisturbed, as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated, where reason is left free to combat it.
2119 페이지 - ... and any failure to obey such order of the court may be punished by such court as a contempt thereof. All process in any such case may be served in the judicial district whereof such person is an inhabitant or wherever he may be found.
2234 페이지 - What finally emerges from the "clear and present danger" cases is a working principle that the substantive evil must be extremely serious and the degree of imminence extremely high before utterances can be punished.
2316 페이지 - The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.
2311 페이지 - States, pursuing its stated objectives, the recent successes of Communist methods in other countries, and the nature and control of the world Communist movement itself, present a clear and present danger to the security of the United States...
2288 페이지 - But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order...