ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

TELEVISION NEWS AND TELEVISED POLITICAL ADVERTISING:
THEIR IMPACT ON THE VOTER

by

Thomas E. Patterson and Robert D. McClure

Department of Political Science
Syracuse University

Prepared for delivery at the National Conference on Money and Politics, sponsored by the Citizens Research Foundation, John F. Kennedy Center, Washington, D.C., February 27-28, 1974. Authors' permission not required to quote or summarize results. However, authors' permission required before data in tables may be reproduced or used extensively.

The research presented here was conducted under National
Science Foundation Grant GS-35408, Robert D. McClure and
Thomas E. Patterson, principal investigators.
The support
of the Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.

-2

SUMMARY

This paper presents some of the first, systematic evidence on the voter impact of television news and televised political advertising. Based on a careful monitoring of the television exposure of more than 600 voters during the 1972 presidential election, the paper focuses on the relative contributions of television news and advertising to voters' awareness of candidates' issue positions. The paper concludes with several recommendations for improved use of television in American political campaigns.

Results of the analyses indicate that:

*Exposure to television network news had only minimal
impact on voters' awareness of candidates' issue
positions.

*When impact due to television news exposure existed,
it was limited to a few issues and to voters who
had low exposure to newspapers. (This finding
contrasts sharply with the effects of newspaper
exposure--newspapers had a substantial voter impact
on almost all issues and under almost all conditions
of exposure to other media.)

*In contrast with television news, exposure to televised
political advertising had significant impact on voters'
issue awareness.

*The effects of political advertising were clearest among
voters with low exposure to news sources.

*Television news had minimal effects because it simply
did not provide voters with much information about
candidates' issue positions, preferring instead action
film of campaign activity and "pseudo events." (For
example, during the period Sept. 18 to Nov. 6, 1972,
televised political advertising contained twice as
much explicit content about candidates' issue positions
as the total weeknight news coverage on the average
network.

*The format of television news is an obstacle to
communicating issue in formation.
stories often precludes explicit

The brevity of its linkages of events

with candidates' issue positions. Rapid presentation
creates a montage effect that confuses viewers and
hinders information retention.

Based on these findings, recommendations for improved use of television in American politics include:

*Networks should reduce their coverage of campaign

"

activity and "pseudo political events. These

-3

stories contain almost no useful information, and viewers appear bored by them. Survey evidence indicates voter preferences for more issue coverage and candidate interviews.

*Networks should provide in-depth coverage of fewer stories rather than continuing their superficial coverage of many stories. This format would enhance voter learning.

*Because televised political ads are highly effective
communicators, "free time" for televised political
commercials ought be a part of American campaigns.
It would equalize candidate access to the medium,
reduce costs, and bring desirable information to
otherwise poorly informed voters.

29-801 0-74—App.— -9

SECTION I.

-4

TELEVISION NEWS AND TELEVISED POLITICAL ADVERTISING:
THEIR IMPACT ON THE VOTER

by

Thomas E. Patterson and Robert D. McClure
Syracuse University

We have no accurate measure . . of the impact of political broadcasting on voters. Yet most informed people believe that the impact is profound, and there is no question that political strategists and political candidates increasingly mold their campaigns around the use of television.

Report of the Twentieth Century
Fund Commission on Campaign
Costs in the Electronic Era

INTRODUCTION

Although most Americans say they rely primarily on television for information during presidential campaigns, the surprising fact is that little is known about the impact of political television. Herbert E. Alexander, director of the Citizens Research Foundation and formerly executive director of the Presidential Commission on Campaign Costs, has written that "social scientists using modern techniques have not really told us what we want to know about the

* The research presented here was conducted under National Science Foundation grant GS-35408, Robert D. McClure and Thomas E. Patterson, principal investigators. The support of the Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. We would also like to acknowledge the assistance given us by Richard Ender, our principal assistant, and by the following assistants who aided in the preparation of the paper: Helenanne Robertson, Donald Hough, Cindy Ludvigsen, and Karen Colburn.

-5

(pages 6 and 7 do not exist)

impact of television on politics...Much more is known about the effects of advertising on consumer behavior than about the impact of political communication--whether presented as news or as direct advertising--on voter behavior."

This paper presents some of the first available evidence on the impact of television news and televised political advertising on voters. It focuses on the mass media's contribution to voters' awareness of candidates' issue positions during the 1972 presidential election. Our major conclusions are the following:

*Level of exposure to television network news had only
minimal impact on voters' awareness of candidates' issue
positions, while level of exposure to newspapers had a
clear and substantial impact on voters' issue awareness.

*Level of exposure to televised political advertising had
a clear and substantial impact on voters' issue awareness,
and its effects were centered among those voters with low
exposure to news sources.

The remainder of this paper is divided into four sections. Section II contains our methods and procedures. Section III presents our findings. Section IV discusses and interprets these findings. Section V contains our recommendations for improving the use of television in American political campaigns. The reader who has no interest in the procedures and technical aspects of our findings is advised to skip to the summary of Section III and begin reading the paper there.

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »