But we, who only do infuse The rage in them like boute-feus, "Tis our example that inftils In them th' infection of our ills. For, as fome late philofophers Have well obferv'd, beasts that converse 785 Get pigs all th' year, and bitches dogs. 790 We read in Nero's time, the Heathen, 795 When they destroy'd the Christian brethren, They few'd them in the skins of bears, And then fet dogs about their ears; From whence, no doubt, th' invention came First, for the name; the word Bear-baiting 805 Is carnal, and of man's creating; For certainly there 's no fuch word In all the Scripture on record; No more be prov'd by Scripture, than Mere human creature-cobwebs all. 810 Thirdly, Thirdly, It is idolatrous; 815 For when men run a-whoring thus With their inventions, whatsoe'er Ralpho, thou doft prevaricate: 820 For though the thefis which thou lay'st 825 (For that bear-baiting should appear Jure divino law fuller Than Synods are, thou doft deny Yet there's a fallacy in this; For if by fly homœofis, 830 Tuffis pro crepitu, an art Under a cough to flur a f―t, Thou wouldst fophiftically imply Both are unlawful, I deny. And I, quoth Ralpho, do not doubt 835 But Bear-baiting may be made out, In gofpel-times, as lawful as is Provincial or Parochial Claffis; And that both are so near of kin, And like in all, as well as fin, 840 Ver. 831, 832.] Thefe two lines left out in the editions 1674, 1684, 1689, 1700, and restored 1704. And That, put them in a bag, and fhake them, And not know which is which, unless For 'tis not hard t' imagine whether 845 O' th' two is worst, though I name neither. But art not able to keep touch. Mira de lente, as 'tis i' th' adage, Id eft, to make a leek a cabbage; 850 Thou wilt at beft but fuck a bull, Or fhear swine, all cry, and no wool; For what can fynods have at all, With Bear that 's analogical? Or what relation has debating Of Church affairs with Bear-beating? A just comparison still is Of things ejufdem generis: And then what genus rightly doth 855 Include and comprehend them both? 860 Ver. 851] This and the following line thus altered 1674, Thou canft at beft but overstrain A paradox, and thy own brain. Thus they continued in the editions 1684, 1689, 1700. Reftored in 1704, in the following blundering manner, Thou 'It be at beft but fuch a bull, &c. and the blunder continued in all the editions till Dr. Gray's. Ver. 860. Include, &c.] In the two first editions of 1663, Comprehend them inclufive both. If animal, both of us may As juftly pafs for bears as they; For we are animals no lefs; Where we muft give the world a proof Another manner of difpute: A controverfy that affords Actions for arguments, not words; Which we muft manage at a rate Of prowefs and conduct adequate 865 870 To what our place and fame doth promise, 875 And all the Godly expect from us. Nor fhall they be deceiv'd, unless We're flurr'd and outed by success; Ver. 862.] As likely, in the two first editions. 880 885 But But fometimes fail, and in their stead 890 Yet we have no great cause to doubt, Our actions ftill have borne us out; Which though they 're known to be so ample, We need not copy from example; We're not the only person durst 895 Attempt this province, nor the first. Of these the objects of our wroth, And equal fame and glory from To whom we have been oft compar'd 900 905 For perfon, parts, addrefs, and beard; Both equally reputed ftout, And in the fame cause both have fought; 910 He oft in fuck attempts as these Came off with glory and fuccefs: Ver. 904.] The writers of the General Historical Dictionary, vol. vi. p. 291, imagine, "That the chafm here is to be filled "with the words Sir Samuel Luke, because the line before it is ❝ of ten fyllables, and the measure of the verse generally used "in this poem is of eight." Honour |