페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

3. By a subscribing witness. [Amendment, approved March 24, 1874; in effect July 1, 1874.

1941. If the subscribing witness denies or does not recollect the execution of the writing, its execution may still be proved by other evidence.

1942. Where, however, evidence is given that the party against whom the writing is offered has at any time admitted its execution, no other evidence of the execution need be given when the instrument is one mentioned in section 1945, or one produced from the custody of the adverse party, and has been acted upon by him as genuine.

1943. The handwriting of a person may be proved by any one who believes it to be his, and who has seen him write, or has seen writings purporting to be his, upon which he has acted or been charged, and who has thus acquired a knowledge of his handwriting.

1944. Evidence respecting the handwriting may also be given by a comparison, made by the witness or the jury, with writings admitted or treated as genuine by the party against whom the evidence is offered, or proved to be genuine to the satisfaction of the judge. [Amendment, approved March 24, 1874; in effect July 1, 1874.

1. Opinions of Witnesses.-Penal Code, sec. 1321, n. 29, ante.

1945. Where a writing is more than thirty years old, the comparisons may be made with writings purporting to be genuine, and generally respected and acted upon as such, by persons having an interest in knowing the fact.

1946. The entries and other writings of a decedent, made at or near the time of the transaction, and in a position to know the facts stated therein, may be read as prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein, in the following cases:

1. When the entry was made against the interest of the person making it;

2. When it was made in a professional capacity, and in the ordinary course of professional conduct;

3. When it was made in the performance of a duty specially enjoined by law. [Amendment, approved March 24, 1874; in effect July 1, 1874.

1947. When an entry is repeated in the regular course of business, one being copied from another at or near the time of the transaction, all the entries are equally regarded as originals.

1948. Every private writing, except last wills and testaments, may be acknowledged or proved and certified in the manner

provided for the acknowledgment or proof of conveyances of real property, and the certificate of such acknowledgment or proof is prima facie evidence of the execution of the writing, in the same manner as if it were a conveyance of real property. [Amendment, approved March 24, 1874; in effect July 1, 1874. [1949. Repealed by act approved March 24, 1874; in effect July 1, 1874. Amendments 1873-4, 387.]

1950. The record of a conveyance of real property, or any other record, a transcript of which is admissible in evidence, must not be removed from the office where it is kept, except upon the order of a court, in cases where the inspection of the record is shown to be essential to the just determination of the cause or proceeding pending, or where the court is held in the same building with such office. [Amendment, approved March 24, 1874; in effect July 1, 1874.

1951. Every instrument conveying or affecting real property, acknowledged, or proved and certified, as provided, in the Civil Code, may, together with the certificate of acknowledgment or proof, be read in evidence, in an action or proceeding, without further proof; and a certified copy of the record of such conveyance or instrument thus acknowledged or proved, may also be read in evidence, with the like effect as the original, on proof, by affidavit or otherwise, that the original is not in the possession or under the control of the party producing the certified copy. [New section, approved March 24, 1874; in effect July 1, 1874.

CHAPTER IV.

MATERIAL OBJECTS PRESENTED TO THE SENSES, OTHER THAN WRITINGS.

SECTION 1954. Material objects.

1954. Whenever an object, cognizable by the senses, has such a relation to the fact in dispute as to afford reasonable grounds of belief respecting it, or to make an item in the sum of the evidence, such object may be exhibited to the jury, or its existence, situation, and character may be proved by witnesses. The admission of such evidence must be regulated by the sound discretion of the court.

1. Viewing Premises by Jury. --Penal Code, sec. 1119, n. 1, ante.

CHAPTER V.

INDIRECT EVIDENCE, INFERENCES, AND PRESUMPTIONS.

SECTION 1957. Indirect evidence classified.

1958. Inference defined.

1959. Presumption defined.

1960. When an inference arises.

1961. Presumptions may be controverted, when.
1962. Specification of conclusive presumptions.

1963. All other presumptions may be controverted.

1957. Indirect evidence is of two kinds:

1. Inferences; and,

2. Presumptions.

1. Evidence in Criminal Actions. -Penal Code, sec. 1102, n. 11, ante. 1958. An inference is a deduction which the reason of the jury makes from the facts proved, without an express direction of law to that effect.

1959. A presumption is a deduction which the law expressly directs to be made from particular facts.

1. Presumption of Innocence.-Penal Code, sec. 1096, ante.

1960. An inference must be founded:

1. On a fact legally proved; and,

2. On such a deduction from that fact as is warranted by a consideration of the usual propensities or passions of men, the particular propensities or passions of the person whose act is in question, the course of business, or the course of nature.

1961. A presumption (unless declared by law to be conclusive) may be controverted by other evidence, direct or indirect; but unless so controverted the jury are bound to find according to the presumption.

1962. The following presumptions, and no others, are deemed conclusive:

1. A malicious and guilty intent, from the deliberate commission of an unlawful act, for the purpose of injuring another;

2. The truth of the facts recited, from the recital in a written instrument between the parties thereto, or their successors in interest by a subsequent title; but this rule does not apply to the recital of a consideration;

3. Whenever a party has, by his own declaration, act, or omission, intentionally and deliberately led another to believe a particular thing true, and to act upon such belief, he can not,

in any litigation arising out of such declaration, act, or omission, be permitted to falsify it;

4. A tenant is not permitted to deny the title of his landlord at the time of the commencement of the relation;

5. The issue of a wife cohabiting with her husband, who is not impotent, is indisputably presumed to be legitimate;

6. The judgment or order of a court, when declared by this code to be conclusive; but such judgment or order must be alleged in the pleadings if there be an opportunity to do so; if there be no such opportunity, the judgment or order may be used as evidence;

7. Any other presumption which, by statute, is expressly made conclusive.

1963. All other presumptions are satisfactory, if uncontradicted. They are denominated disputable presumptions, and may be controverted by other evidence. The following are of that kind:

1. That a person is innocent of crime or wrong;

2. That an unlawful act was done with an unlawful intent; 3. That a person intends the ordinary consequence of his voluntary act;

4. That a person takes ordinary care of his own concerns; 5. That evidence willfully suppressed would be adverse if produced;

6. That higher evidence would be adverse from inferior being produced;

7. That money paid by one to another was due to the latter; 8. That a thing delivered by one to another belonged to the latter;

9. That an obligation delivered up to the debtor has been paid;

10. That former rent or installments have been paid when a receipt for later is produced;

11. That things which a person possesses are owned by him; 12. That a person is the owner of property from exercising acts of ownership over it, or from common reputation of his ownership;

13. That a person in possession of an order on himself for the payment of money, or the delivery of a thing, has paid the money or delivered the thing accordingly;

14. That a person acting in a public office was regularly appointed to it;

15. That official duty has been regularly performed;

16. That a court or judge, acting as such, whether in this state or any other state or country, was acting in the lawful exercise of his jurisdiction;

17. That a judicial record, when not conclusive, does still correctly determine or set forth the rights of the parties;

18. That all matters within an issue were laid before the jury and passed upon by them; and in like manner, that all matters within a submission to arbitration were laid before the arbitrators and passed upon by them;

19. That private transactions have been fair and regular;

20. That the ordinary course of business has been followed; 21. That a promissory note or bill of exchange was given or indorsed for a sufficient consideration;

22. That an indorsement of a negotiable promissory note or bill of exchange was made at the time and place of making the note or bill;

23. That a writing is truly dated;

24. That a letter duly directed and mailed was received in the regular course of the mail;

25. Identity of person from identity of name;

26. That a person not heard from in seven years is dead; 27. That acquiescence followed from a belief that the thing acquiesced in was conformable to the right or fact;

28. That things have happened according to the ordinary course of nature, and the ordinary habits of life;

29. That persons acting as copartners have entered into a contract of copartnership;

30. That a man and woman deporting themselves as husband and wife have entered into a lawful contract of marriage;

31. That a child born in lawful wedlock, there being no divorce from bed and board, is legitimate;

32. That a thing once proved to exist continues as long as is usual with things of that nature;

33. That the law has been obeyed;

34. That a document or writing more than thirty years old, is genuine, when the same has been since generally acted upon as genuine, by persons having an interest in the question, and its custody has been satisfactorily explained;

35. That a printed and published book, purporting to be printed or published by public authority, was so printed or published;

36. That a printed and published book, purporting to contain reports of cases adjudged in the tribunals of the state or coun

« 이전계속 »