페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

and 121 New York State Reporter

tion of a marginal street for other than dock | Measure of damages, see "Damages," § 3. purposes.-Vilias v. Featherson (Sup.) 1094. § 7. Torts.

In action against a city for negligently repairing a street, defendant held entitled to a charge that it was not liable if the work was done by an independent contractor, over whom it had no control.-Jewell v. City of Mt. Vernon (Sup.) 120.

8. Fiscal management, public debt, securities, and taxation.

Purchaser of city bonds held not entitled to rescission of contract, without restoration of all bonds delivered to him.-City of Ironwood v. Wickes (Sup.) 554.

Failure of assessors to publish notice of their meeting to hear complaints in both newspapers in a village held not fatal.-Trumbull v. Palmer (Sup.) 614.

Failure of assessors to enter on roll names and property of males liable to poll tax held to render the tax levy void.-Trumbull v. Palmer (Sup.) 614.

Failure to hold the tax meeting provided by Village Law, Laws 1897, p. 402, c. 414, § 105. is a jurisdictional defect, and vitiates the tax levy.-Trumbull v. Palmer (Sup.) 614.

Under Laws 1878, p. 488, c. 410, as amended by Laws 1880, p. 456, c. 318, and further amended by Laws 1881, p. 447, c. 326, and Laws 1897, pp. 3, 5, c. 378, §§ 4, 9, the city of New York held not liable for certain certificates issued by a commission created for the purpose of opening and improving an avenue in Long Island City.-East River Nat. Bank v. City of New York (Sup.) 803.

Where, at a sale for taxes, the fees charged and included in the sale are greater than allowed by law, the sale is void.-Gabel v. Williams (Co. Ct.) 240.

Holder of certificate of city tax sale cannot maintain summary process to dispossess occupant until the deed is obtained.-Gabel v. Williams (Co. Ct.) 240.

MUNICIPAL COURTS.

See "Courts," § 3.

MUTUAL BENEFIT INSURANCE. See "Insurance," § 13.

NAMES.

Pleading damages, see "Damages," § 4.

By particular classes of parties.

See "Carriers," §§ 2, 3; “Executors and Admin-
istrators," § 4; "Innkeepers"; "Municipai
Corporations," § 7.

Attorneys, see "Attorney and Client," § 1.
Employers, see "Master and Servant." § 3-8
Railroad companies, see "Railroads," § 2.
Condition or use of particular species of property,
works, or machinery.

See "Bridges," § 1; "Electricity"; "Railroads,"
§ 2; "Street Railroads," § 1.
Demised premises, see "Landlord and Tenant,”
§ 4.
Contributory negligence.

Of passenger, see "Carriers," § 3.
Of person injured by electricity, see "Electric-
ity."
Of person injured by operation of street rail-
road, see "Street Railroads," § 1.

es," § 1.

Of person killed by fall from bridge, see "Bridg-
Of person killed by operation of railroad, see
"Railroads," § 2.

Of servant, see "Master and Servant," § 7.
or omissions constituting
§ 1. Acts
negligence.

The maintenance, construction, and manage ment of swinging doors attached to a department store held not negligent.-Pardington v. Abraham (Sup.) 670.

§ 2. Proximate cause of injury.

Owners of a department store held not liable for injuries to a visitor by being struck by a swinging door, which was allowed to swing by the negligence of another visitor.-Pardington v. Abraham (Sup.) 670.

§ 3. Actions.

Plaintiff's act in going into a dangerous position held not contributory negligence as a matter of law. Steinacker v. Hills Bros. Co. (Sup).)) 33.

In an action for injuries by alleged defective premises, evidence held to constitute a fatal variance.-Reilly v. Vought (Sup.) 492.

A boy, going into an alley on private land. leading from a street to a public saloon, keld entitled to the same degree of protection against danger from a dangerous adjacent wall as he would have been on a highway.-Haack v. Brooklyn Labor Lyceum Ass'n (Sup.) 814.

In an action for injuries by collision between

Designation of parties to action, see "Parties," trucks, evidence held sufficient to render the § 2.

NAVIGABLE WATERS.

See "Waters and Water Courses"; "Wharves."

NEGLIGENCE.

Assessment of damages, see "Damages," § 4.
Causing death, see "Death," § 2.

question of defendant's negligence one for the jury.-Powles v. Halstead (Sup.) 928.

The jury may find that a boy 71⁄2 years of age is not chargeable with contributory negligence. -Fritsch v. New York & Q. C. Ry. Co. (Sup.) 942.

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS.

See "Bills and Notes."

NEWSPAPERS.

Under County Law, § 22 (Laws 1892, p. 1750,
686) and § 19 (Laws 1900, p. 933, c. 400),
esignation of illegal number of papers for pub-
cation of election notices held wholly void,
nd not a valid designation as to papers first
amed.-In re Ford (Sup.) 407.

Under County Law, Laws 1892, p. 1750, c.
86, §§ 21, 22, board of supervisors, in fixing
ompensation for the publication of election no-
ices, held not limited to the minimum and max-
mum charges for the publication of Session
Laws. In re Ford (Sup.) 407.

Publisher of a newspaper held not to have act-
ed under duress in signing a designation of his
paper for the publication of election notices for
a smaller compensation than that provided in
an alleged former designation. In re Ford
(Sup.) 407.

NEW TRIAL.

[ocr errors]

Opening or vacating judgment, see "Judgment,"
§ 3.
Stipulation that appeal may be treated as mo-
tion for, as giving Supreme Court jurisdic-
tion, see "Appeal," § 1.

1. Nature and scope of remedy.

An order denying a motion for a new trial
need not be resettled to grant leave to apply
for a new trial at special term, on grounds other
than those specified in Code Civ. Proc. § 599.
-Garofalo v. Prividi (Sup.) 467.

2. Grounds.

Erroneous withdrawal of case from jury held
to entitle defendants to a new trial.-Process

Copper & Brass Co. v. Perfect Arc Lamp &
Mfg. Co. (Sup.) 987.

New trial granted on the ground that the ver-
dict was against the weight of the evidence.-
Cullinan v. Kisselbrack (Sup.) 1025.

3. Proceedings to procure new trial.
A motion for a new trial on the minutes can-
not be made in an action tried to the court
without a jury, and an appeal from an order
denying such a motion will not lie.-Bosworth
v. Kinghorn (Sup.) 983.

NEXT OF KIN.

See "Descent and Distribution."

NONSUIT.

Before trial, see "Dismissal and Nonsuit."

NONUSER.

Of easement, see "Easements," § 1.

NOTES.

Promissory notes, see "Bills and Notes."

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Consolidation of action for damages and for in-
junction to restrain nuisance and subsequent
action for damages alone, see "Action," § 1.
Requests for instructions in action for dam-
ages, see "Trial," § 6.

1. Private nuisances.

The operation of an electric light plant in a
residential neighborhood was no less a nui-
sance because no care in its operation could
render it less obnoxious.-Pritchard v. Edison
Electric Illuminating Co. (Sup.) 225.

electric lighting plant was a nuisance.-Pritch-
Evidence held to warrant a finding that an
ard v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co. (Sup.)
225.

A lessee of premises is entitled to recover
damages sustained by him during his tenancy
from the maintenance of a nuisance adjacent
to the premises.-Pritchard v. Edison Electric
Illuminating Co. (Sup.) 225.

maintenance of a nuisance, consisting of an
In an action for damages because of the
electric lighting plant, held proper to admit
evidence as to the obstruction of the street
in front of plaintiff's premises by dirt and
ashes.-Pritchard v. Edison Electric Illuminat-
ing Co. (Sup.) 225.

In an action for damages for the maintenance
of a nuisance, held not error to admit in evi-
dence a petition by neighboring owners to the
board of health.-Pritchard v. Edison Electric
Illuminating Co. (Sup.) 225.

In an action for damages because of a nui-
sance, a requested instruction on damages held
properly refused.-Pritchard v. Edison Electric
Illuminating Co. (Sup.) 225.

In an action by a lessee of a hotel for dam-
ages from a nuisance, the measure of damages
determined.-Pritchard v. Edison Electric Il-
luminating Co. (Sup.) 225.

and 121 New York State Reporter

ORDER OF PROOF.

§ 2. Public nuisances.
Maintenance of an automobile station on a
boulevard at Rockaway Beach held not a com- At trial, see "Trial," § 3.
mon-law nuisance.-Stein v. Lyon (Sup.) 125.

OBJECTIONS.

Necessity for purpose of review in criminal
prosecutions, see "Criminal Law," § 6.
To reception of evidence, see "Trial," § 3.

OBLIGATION OF CONTRACT.
Laws impairing, see "Constitutional Law," § 1.

OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE.

See "Rescue."

OCCUPATION.

Of real property, see "Use and Occupation."

OFFER.

Of proof, see "Trial," § 3.

OFFICERS.

Mandamus, see "Mandamus," § 1.
Quo warranto, see "Quo Warranto."

Particular classes of officers.

See "Coroners"; "Judges"; "Receivers"; "Sher-
iffs and Constables."

Bank officers, see "Banks and Banking," § 1.
Corporate officers, see "Corporations," § 3.
Municipal officers, see "Municipal Corpora-
tions," § 1.

Village tax assessors, see "Municipal Corpora-
tions," § 8.

1. Rights, powers, duties, and liabil-
ities.

It is against public policy to permit public
officers to defend actions for purely personal
torts at the expense of the public.-Donahue v.
Keeshan (Sup.) 144.

OPENING.

Judgment, see "Judgment," §§ 1, 3.

OPINION EVIDENCE.

In civil actions, see "Evidence," § 6.

OPTIONS.

To purchase realty, see "Vendor and Purchas-
er," § 1.

To rescind contract of sale, see "Vendor and
Purchaser," § 2.

ORAL CONTRACTS.

See "Insurance," § 3.

[blocks in formation]

A complaint by an assignee to recover the
balance due on a debt previously secured by
bond and mortgage not assigned held based on
the debtor's oral promise to pay after the
mortgage had been voluntarily satisfied, and
not on the bond, so that the obligee was not a
necessary party defendant.-Holmes v. Ely
(Sup.) 712.

2. Designation and description.
Where a defendant is sued by fictitious name,
under Consolidation Act, Laws 1882, p. 339, c.
410, 1297, the judgment must identify him.-
Goldberg v. Markowitz (Sup.) 1045.

Defects, objections, and amend-held not admissible as evidence against a sub-
sequent claimant under the will.-Huber v.
Case (Sup.) 663.

ment.
ider Code Civ. Proc. § 488, subd. 6, and
ons 498, 499, objection for defect of par-
defendant held available only by demurrer.
G. Hyde & Sons v. Lesser (Sup.) 878.

[blocks in formation]

persons.

Where summons in dispossession proceedings
is served on a member of a firm to which
e property was rented, and he appeared, such
vice was binding on the firm.-Maneely v.
ayers (Sup.) 471.

Action against copartners should not be dis-
ssed, on vacation of attachment, under Laws
02, p. 1519, c. 580, § 90.-Feldman v. Siegel
p.) 538.

Evidence that a firm of which defendant was
member purchased goods will not sustain an
tion against him individually for the price.-
parks v. Fogarty (Sup.) 648.

A general denial to an action against defend-
at individually is not a waiver of the non-
inder of his partner, so as to sustain the
tion, though the proof shows only a partner-
ip liability.-Sparks v. Fogarty (Sup.) 648.
In an action for fraudulent representations,
reliance on which plaintiff's assignor sold
ods to a partnership of which defendant was
member, the other partners were not neces-
ry parties.-A. G. Hyde & Sons v. Lesser
Sup.) 878.

3. Death of partner, and surviving
partners.

Recorded declarations that partnership real
state devised had in fact been treated by the
artners as converted into personal property,

Partnership real estate, in the absence of
an agreement to the contrary, held changed into
personalty only to the extent necessary for the
purposes of partnership equities, as between
the partners, or the surviving partner and the
deceased partner's representatives.-Huber v.
Case (Sup.) 663.

4. Dissolution, settlement, and ac-
counting.

A surviving partner held entitled to liquidate
the affairs of the firm.-Secor v. Tradesmen's
Nat. Bank (Sup.) 181.

An administrator of a deceased partner, if
authorized to maintain a suit to recover a fund
to which the surviving partner is entitled, held
entitled to a recovery against all the persons
having acquired any part of the fund.-Secor
v. Tradesmen's Nat. Bank (Sup.) 181.

PASSENGERS.

See "Carriers," § 3.

PATENTS.

Necessity of allowing competition in purchase
of patented articles by city, see "Municipal
Corporations," § 3.

§ 1. Title, conveyances, and contracts.

Contract between an inventor and manu-
held, that the manufacturer could not, by ten-
facturer of a patented article construed, and
dering the inventor a specified minimum roy-
alty, hold the patents without manufacturing
or selling the article.-Corbet v. Manhattan
Brass Co. (Sup.) 577.

Contract between manufacturer and inven-
tor of a patented article held not to require
the former to pay the latter a specified annual
minimum royalty, irrespective of whether the
same was earned from sales of the article.-
Corbet v. Manhattan Brass Co. (Sup.) 577.

PAUPERS.

1. Support, services, and expenses.

Under Laws 1892, p. 56, c. 36, § 2, and Laws
1875, p. 188, c. 213, §§ 3, 4, fact that parents
contracted to support the child at an institu-
of deaf mute, during period for which county
tion, acquired a residence in another county,
held not to relieve county of liability.-Western
New York Institution for Deaf Mutes v. Yates
County (Sup.) 534.

PAWNBROKERS.

pawnbrokers where several loans were made to
Under Laws 1883, p. 508, c. 339, regulating
the same person at different times on different
property pledged, none of which was redeem-
ed, a surplus arising on the sale of the property
pledged for one loan could not be set off against
deficiencies arising on sales for the other loans.
-Stephens v. Simpson (Sup.) 1068.

PAYMENT.

and 121 New York State Reporter

To contractor as affecting right of subcontractor to lien, see "Mechanics' Liens," § 1. Of particular classes of obligations or liabilities. See "Costs," § 5.

Claims against estate of decedent, see "Executors and Administrators," § 5.

§ 1. Requisites and sufficiency.

The delivery of a certified check by a bank depositor to his creditor held to constitute payment to the amount of the check.-Herrmann Furniture & Plumbers' Cabinet Works v. German Exch. Bank (Sup.) 462.

Transfer of an interest in a second real estate mortgage as a part of the consideration for goods sold held to constitute payment for the goods to the extent of the agreed value of the mortgage.-John H. Mahnken Co. v. Pelletreau (Sup.) 737.

[blocks in formation]

Caused by electricity, see "Electricity." Construction and operation of instructions, see "Trial," § 6.

Examination of witnesses, see "Witnesses," § 2. Form, requisites, and sufficiency of instructions, see "Trial," § 6.

Harmless or prejudicial character of error in
action for, see "Appeal," § 5.
Impeachment of witnesses, see "Witnesses," § 3.
Materiality of evidence, see "Evidence," § 2.
Measure of damages, see "Damages," § 3.
Opinion evidence, see "Evidence," § 6.
Pleading damages, see "Damages." § 4.
Reception of evidence, see "Trial," § 3.
To employé, see "Master and Servant." §§ 3-8.
To infant, see "Infants," § 2.
To licensee, see "Railroads." § 2.
To married woman, see "Husband and Wife,”
$ 1.
To passenger, see "Carriers," § 3.
To person on or near railroad tracks, see "Rail-
roads," § 2.

To tenant, see "Landlord and Tenant," § 4.

[blocks in formation]

See "Damages," § 4; "Judgment,” § 7; “Usury," § 1.

Statute of frauds, see "Frauds, Statute of," §2. In actions by or against particular classes of parties.

See "Master and Servant," §§ 2, 8, 9.
Assignees, see "Assignments," § 3.
Trustees, see "Trusts," $ 5.

In particular actions or proceedings.
See "Equity." § 2; "Fraud," § 2; "Libel and
Slander," § 2: "Negligence," § 3; "Partition,"
§ 1; "Quo Warranto," § 1; "Replevin," § 1.
For breach of contract, see "Contracts," § 6.
For causing death, see "Death," § 2.

For establishment of trust, see "Trusts," § 5. For personal injuries, see "Master and Servant," §§ 8, 9.

« 이전계속 »