Darwinism refuted out of Darwin's book [The origin of species].1885 |
ÀÚÁÖ ³ª¿À´Â ´Ü¾î ¹× ±¸¹®
admits appears assertion bred breeding calls carried changes chapter Chinese geese common and Chinese concluded confinement considered contrary created creation crossed darkness Darwin's book degree of sterility descended distinct distinct species early earth eight endowed with sterility experi extent extinct extreme fact fertile hybrid animals five animals five species flocks foundation four or five freely further geese genera Genesis geologists gone greater highly fertile hybrids produced idea important inconsistent India infallible inter known lately light limits living ment mules namely natural selection never have produced notice objection old world operation origin of species originally created parent species perfect perfectly fertile perfectly fertile hybrid plants and animals pollen probable produce offspring progeny pure parent raised reason to believe recent recorded regard respect restoration result single species by natural stigma successive suppose truth varieties various whole wonderful wreck
Àαâ Àο뱸
6 ÆäÀÌÁö - Analogy would lead me one step further, namely, to the belief that all animals and plants are descended from some one prototype. But analogy may be a deceitful guide.
12 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... individuals of the same species ? Why should some species cross with facility, and yet produce very sterile hybrids ; and other species cross with extreme difficulty, and yet produce fairly fertile hybrids ? Why should there often be so great a difference in the result of a reciprocal cross between the same two species ? Why, it may even be asked, has the production of hybrids been permitted ? To grant to species the special power of producing hybrids, and then to stop their further propagation...
12 ÆäÀÌÁö - ... same two species, for according as the one species or the other is used as the father or the mother, there is generally some difference, and occasionally the widest possible difference, in the facility of effecting an union. The hybrids, moreover, produced from reciprocal crosses often differ in fertility. Now do these complex and singular rules indicate that species have been endowed with sterility simply to prevent their becoming confounded in nature? I think not.
12 ÆäÀÌÁö - So, in hybrids themselves, there are some which never have produced, and probably never would produce, even with the pollen of the pure parents, a single fertile seed: but in some of these cases a first trace of fertility may be detected, by the pollen of one of the pure parent-species causing the flower of the hybrid to wither earlier than it otherwise would have done; and the early withering of the flower is well known to be a sign of incipient fertilization. From this extreme degree of sterility...
8 ÆäÀÌÁö - THE view generally entertained by naturalists is that species, when intercrossed, have been specially endowed with the quality of sterility, in order to prevent the confusion of all organic forms.
8 ÆäÀÌÁö - THE view commonly entertained by naturalists is that species, when intercrossed, have been specially endowed with sterility, in order to prevent their confusion. This view certainly seems at first highly probable, for species living together could hardly have been kept distinct had they been capable of freely crossing.
5 ÆäÀÌÁö - The fact of the fossil remains of each formation being in some degree intermediate in character between the fossils in the formations above and below, is simply explained by their intermediate position in the chain of descent. The grand fact that all extinct beings can be classed with all recent beings, naturally follows from the living and the extinct being the offspring of common parents.