 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1915 - 732 ÆäÀÌÁö
...section 59 of the Negotiable Instrument act of 1907, (Hurd's Stat. 1913, p. 1682,) which provides that every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims, acquired the title as a holder in due course; and section 52 of that act, which defines a holder in due course to be one... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1912 - 666 ÆäÀÌÁö
...infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it." By section 1611 that: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course," etc. Under such a statute it is very clear that, when it ,' was shown that... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1909 - 588 ÆäÀÌÁö
...1907, "a holder in due course" is defined. Section 1611 provides that "Every holder is deemed prime facie to be a holder in due course; but, when it is...some person under whom, he claims acquired the title in due course." By section 1607 it is provided that "The title of a person who negotiates an instrument... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1910 - 688 ÆäÀÌÁö
...1470.) To the same effect is our statute (section 1611, Comp. Laws 1907), which provides: "Every 3 holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due...defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or someone under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course." When the plaintiff proved... | |
 | 1908 - 1282 ÆäÀÌÁö
...instruments act by which it is provided in section 59 (Code Supp. 1907, ¡× ¬©¬°¬Ò¬°¬Ñ¬©¬°), as follows: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some pei-son under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule... | |
 | 1905 - 1120 ÆäÀÌÁö
...prlma facie to be a holder in due course; but when it is shown that the title of any person who was negotiated the instrument was defective the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some other person under whom he claims acquired the title as holder in due course. But the last mentioned... | |
 | 1914 - 448 ÆäÀÌÁö
...plaintiff. The 59th section of the Negotiable Instruments Act of May 16, 1901, PL 194, provides that " every holder is deemed, prima facie, to be a holder...claims acquired the title as holder in due course." Section 55 declares that " the title of a person who negotiates an instrument is defective, within... | |
 | 1911 - 1170 ÆäÀÌÁö
...the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating It." Section 3450 reads as follows: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...claims acquired the title as holder in due course. * * * " Our inquiry, therefore, is whether the bank from which respondents acquired title was a holder... | |
 | 1911 - 1164 ÆäÀÌÁö
...infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating it." By section 1611 that: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course," etc. Under such a statute It is very clear that, when it was shown that the... | |
 | 1918 - 1210 ÆäÀÌÁö
...infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the pereon negotiating it." Section 5892 reads thus: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...or some person under whom he claims, acquired the titje as a holder in due course; but the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who... | |
| |