REPORTS OF CASES

HEARD AND DETERMINED IN THE

APPELLATE DIVISION

OF THB

SUPREME COURT

OF THE

STATE OF NEW YORK.

JEROME B. FISHER, REPORTER.

VOLUME CXXXVII.

1910.

J. B. LYON COMPANY,

ALBANY, N. Y.

Entered, according to Act of ('ongress, in the year nineteen hundred and tun,

BY SAMUEL S. KOENIG, SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF New YORK, In trust for the benefit of the People of the said State, in the ofice of the Librarian of Congress

at Washington, D. C.

JAN II loil

LO

J. B. LYON COMPANY,
PRINTERS, ELECTROTYPERS AND BINDERS,

LYON BLOCK, ALBANY, N. Y.

OF

THE APPELLATE DivisioN OF THE SUPREME COURT.

First Department.
Hon. GEORGE L. INGRAHAM, P. J.

CHESTER B. MCLAUGHLIN,
“ FRANK C. LAUGHLIN.

JOHN PROCTOR CLARKE.
FRANCIS M. SCOTT.

NATHAN L. MILLER.
“ VICTOR J. DOWLING.

Second Department,
Hon. MICHAEL H. HIRSCHBERG, P. J.
“ JOHN WOODWARD.
“ ALMET F. JENKS.

JOSEPH A. BURR.

EDWARD B. THOMAS.
“ ADELBERT P. RICH.*
“ WILLIAM J. CARR.*

Third Department,
Hon. WALTER LLOYD SMITH, P. J.
" JOHN M. KELLOGG.

“ AARON V. S. COCHRANE.
.“ ALBERT H. SEWELL.
“ JAMES W. HOUGHTON.

Fourth Department.
Hon. PETER B. MOLENNAN, P. J.
“ ALFRED SPRING.
“ PARDON C. WILLIAMS.
“ FREDERICK W. KRUSE.
“ JAMES A. ROBSON.

en

Every tenth volume of Hun's Reports from vol. 20 to vol. 90, and every tenth volume of Appellate Division Reports from vol. 10 to vol. 70 contains a Table of the Causes, published in Hun's Reports, which have been passed upon by the Court of Appeals.

Volume 100 App. Div. contains a table collecting all the causes published in the Appellate Division Reports passed upon prior to the issue of that volume.

The tables published in vol. 108 and every tenth volume from vol. 110 contain causes passed upon from the issue of vol. 100 to April 6, 1909.

JEROME B. FISHER,

Reporter.

CAUSES in which the decisions contained in the Appellate Divi

sion Reports have been passed upon by the Court of Appeals.

AMPERSAND HOTEL Co. . HOME Ins. Co. (No. 2). ......... 131 App. Div 361 Order and judgment of Appıllate Division reversed and judgment of the Triul

Term affirmed : 198 N. Y. 495. ARLINGTON Co. o. EMPIRE City FIRE INs. Co............. 131 App. Div. 898

Judgment reversed and new trial granted : 198 N. Y. 569. BASCOMBE 1. MARSHALL (No.1)...............

.. 129 App. Div. 516 Judgment affirmed : 198 1. Y. 538. BAUMANN 1. TANNENBAUM .......

........... 129 App. Div. 903 Judgment afirmed : 198 N. Y. 521. BAXTER r. York REALTY CO ...... ..... ...... ........ 128 App. Div. 79

Judgment cofirmed : 198 X. Y. 521. Beck e. McLANE ......

........ ........ 129 App. Div. 745 Order affirinei anul jud,ment a'solute ordered against appellant : 198 N. Y. 567. BEDELL 2. EMPIRE STATE SURETY Co................... 129 App. Div. 890

Judgment affirmed: 198 N. Y. 531. BELL 0. JAMES .....

........... 129 App. Div. 241 Judgment affirmed : 198 V. Y. 513. BOENTLANDT 0. Loch..... ... ....................... 129 App. Div. 355

Judgment affirmed : 198 M. Y. 631. BORGES C. FREEDMAN...........

.. 123 App. Div. 924 Judgment affirmed : 198 X. Y. 630. BOSOIAN o. HUBBARD ...

· 129 App. Div. 637 Judgment affirmed : 199 N. Y. 563. Bowen v. PHENIX Bridge Co.......... ...... ... 134 Apr. Div. 22 Order of Appellute Division reversed and that of Special Term afirmed: 198 N. Y.

615. BCFFALO COMMERCIAL Ins. Co. v. GEORGER............... 128 App. Div. 914

Judgment afirmed : 198 N. Y. 537. Buxoro 0. SCHLITZER..

..... 129 App. Div. 930 Judgment affirmed : 198 N. Y. 584. BESHTIS C. CATSKILL CEMENT Co.....

........ 128 App. Div. 780 Judgment affirmed : 198 N. Y. 518. BYRNES 0. N. Y. C. &H. R. R. R. Co....... .......... 129 App. Div. 903

Judgment affirmed : 198 N. Y. 574. Carlis 0. N. Y., N. II. & II. R. R. Co....... ......... 135 App. Div. 876 Appeal dismissed unless amended notice of appeul is filed and served : 199 V. 1.600. CHRISTMAN O. Roescu. .

... 132 App. Div. 22 Judgment afirmed : 198 N. Y. 538. CITIZENS CENTRAL NAT. Bk. v. NEW AMSTERDAM Nat. Bk. 128.. App. Div. 554

Judgment affirmed : 198 N. Y. 520. CITY OF New RocHELLE T. CORTRIGHT................... 131 App. Div. 140

Judgment affirmed : 198 N. Y. 572.