No. 409. TENNESSEE COAL, IRON & ET AL. v. MUSCODA LOCAL NO. 123 ET AL. The petitions for rehearing are denied. RAILROAD Co. May 29, 1944. 321 U. S. 590. No. 592. ALLEN CALCULATORS, INC. v. NATIONAL CASH REGISTER CO. ET AL. May 29, 1944. The CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. No. 754. MESHBERGER ET AL. V. FEDERAL LAND BANK OF LOUISVILLE. May 29, 1944. Petitions for rehearing denied. No. 786. WINSTON V. COURTNEY, STATE'S ATTORNEY, ET AL. May 29, 1944. MR. JUSTICE RUTLEDGE took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. No. 789. BLUE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES; No. 790. CLARK ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; and No. 791. PARDEE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. May 29, 1944. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. No. 831, October Term, 1940. TEGTMEYER V. TEGTMEYER ET AL. June 5, 1944. 313 U. S. 568. No. 477, October Term, 1942. TEGTMEYER v. TEGTMEYER ET AL. June 5, 1944. 317 U. S. 689. No. 539. BERNARDS ET AL. v. JOHNSON ET AL. June 5, 1944. 321 U. S. 764. Rehearing Denied. 322 U.S. No.-. ROBERTS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. June 12, 1944. No. 398. HAZEL-ATLAS GLASS Co. v. HARTFORD-EMPIRE Co. June 12, 1944. No. 423. SHAWKEE MANUFACTURING Co. ET AL. V. HARTFORD-EMPIRE Co. June 12, 1944. No. 853. BELLAVANCE V. FRANK MORROW CO., INC. June 12, 1944. Nos. 911, 912, and 913. CHICAGO & EASTERN ILLINOIS RAILROAD CO. ET AL. V. GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD Co. ET AL. June 12, 1944. No. 942. ROCK ISLAND REFINING Co. v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION. June 12, 1944. No. 742. KESLING v. HUMPHREY, WARDEN. June 12, 1944. No. 889. ROBINETTE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. June 12, 1944. No. 355. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CO. ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY OF INDIANA ET AL. June 12, 1944. MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. No. 728. TINKOFF ET AL. v. WEST PUBLISHING CO. ET AL. June 12, 1944. The petition for rehearing or in the alternative for a writ of mandamus is denied. No. 734. SANDERS v. SANFORD, WARDEN. June 12, 1944. The petition for rehearing is denied without prejudice to the presentation to the District Court, in an appropriate proceeding, of the new matters referred to in the petition for rehearing and accompanying papers. No. 766. HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD CO. v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY ET AL. June 12, 1944. In this case the appeal from the interlocutory injunction was dismissed on the ground that the appeal had become moot, the interlocutory injunction having merged in the final injunction. The petition for rehearing is denied. AMENDMENT OF RULES. ORDER. It is ordered that paragraph 2 of Rule 2 of the Rules of this Court be, and the same is hereby, amended to read as follows: "2. Not less than two weeks in advance of application for admission, each applicant shall file with the clerk (1) a certificate from the presiding judge or clerk of the proper court showing that he possesses the foregoing qualifications, (2) his personal statement, on the form approved by the court and furnished by the clerk, and (3) two letters or signed statements of members of the bar of this court, not related to the applicant, who are resident practitioners within the State, Territory, District, or Insular Possession (to which the application refers as provided in paragraph 1 of this rule) stating that the applicant is personally known to them, that he possesses all the qualifications required for admission to the bar of this court, that they have examined his personal statement, and that they affirm that his personal and professional character and standing are good." JUNE 5, 1944. 774 |