페이지 이미지
PDF
ePub

issuance of securities or assumption of others' obligations or liabilities. While the railroads are subject to accounting regulations, such outside companies are not.

The Commission may deny an application of a carrier for the issuance of securities for acquiring nontransport enterprises. As a general rule use of the proceeds from such issuances are authorized only if they benefit transportation. The issuance should be for some lawful object within the carrier's corporate powers, compatible with the public interest and not impair the carrier's ability, financially or otherwise, to perform its service to the public as a common carrier.

Ordinarily the problems posed by conglomerate mergers arise more frequently in the context of an acquisition where two or more carriers would be controlled by the holding company. The Commission's authorization is required in this situation and when the authorization is granted, the Commission is empowered to designate the noncarrier as a carrier subject to regulations relating to reports, accounts, etc., issuance of securities and assumptions of obligation or liability with respect to securities. The problem of a noncarrier acquisition of multi-unit integrated rail systems is receiving continuous study by the Commission.

It is significant that the Commission's power under section 20(5) of the Act to inspect records of a party controlling a carrier, controlled by a carrier or under common control with a carrier (unless themselves held to be a carrier under the provisions of section 5(3) of the Act, extends only to records relevant to such person's relationships to or transaction with such carrier. Section 12(1) of the Act twice similarly limits the Commission's right to inspect noncommon carrier records of such situated parties to matters related to the management of the business of one or more such carriers. While Congress has not granted carte blanche entry to the records of a holding company not itself held to be a carrier under section 5(3) of the Act, the Commission believes that it may look at such records as it deems relevant to the specific purpose of the investigation. These principles apply to all Commission-regulated carriers.

The holding company device, which has long been used to extend or restructure railroad systems, is now being used to join railroads, financially with other types of industries. Subject to some reservations, we are reasonably convinced that this conglomerate approach can be attributed to a desire to improve earnings through diversification. And, it may be argued that this policy could possibly result in revitalization of the railroads, and, consequently, improved railroad transportation for the public. We are equally convinced, however, that the conglomerate restructuring of the railroad industry could pose a threat to the public's interest in an adequate rail transportation system and complicate the Commission's regulatory and enforcement problems.

(b) Motor Carriers.—Two significant motor transportation trends today are diversifications by motor carriers and the purchase of trucking firms by companies outside the industry. Although both trends are relatively recent, prevailing economic conditions indicate that they will continue at an accelerated rate in the future.

Diversification by the motor carriers appears to have been directed principally to the entering of new markets which are basically transport oriented. However a few motor carriers have by diversifying into nontransportation activities taken on the characteristics of “conglomerates.

Trucking diversifications are presently being financed with cash, stock, or a combination of both, with the transactions being facilitated in many instances by holding companies. Although the use of the holding company as a tool for expansion is not a new concept, its use by the motor carrier industry has been increasing rapidly, as indicated herein in Table 2. The fluidity of the situation is indicated by the fact that a number of changes have occurred in the past few months which are not reflected in the table.

Of all the changes transpiring in the trucking industry, our greatest concern, in terms of economic consequences, is the trend toward the purchase of motor transport companies by primarily investment holding companies, conglomerates or nontransportation firms. Although this change is in such a state of flux, thereby making it extremely difficult to make a firm appraisal of the entire scope and scale of the movement, a review of Table 3 does show a fairly comprehensive sample of the more recent transactions.

TABLE 2.-NET OPERATING REVENUES REPORTED IN THE 1967 ICC ANNUAL REPORTS BY MOTOR CARRIER HOLDING COMPANIES

[blocks in formation]

15 383, 750

400, 224

271,285 2 1,788

3180, 800

23, 109

16 107, 907

44, 237

4, 350

Leasing and providing driver personnel for

private carriage.

17 1,358, 121

18 180, 402

533, 213

$ 16,500

19 147,672

Year consummated 1968.

55, 652

2 84,537

52, 479, 601 21,613, 400

21, 084

do.

do. do. do.

5543, 850 2 25, 589

0117,000

2

_do

17,553, 714

20 22, 250

213, 188

86, 147, 417

2 106, 950

2 214, 205

25. Trailhold, Inc.
26. Trailmar Corp-
27. Transport Service, Inc.
28. Hal and Charlie Peterson Foundation.

(14).

29. Weber Moving and Storage, Inc.
30. A. P. A. Truck Leasing Corp-
31. Merchants Transfer and Storage Co.
32. Midwest Terminals, loc.
33. National City Lines, Inc.
34. Spector Industries, Inc.
35. BHM Corp.
36. The Capital Corp-
37. The Colony Co.
38. International Utilities, Inc.
39. Matlack Corp
40. Mohio Leasing Corp.
41. Red Arrow Securities Corp-
42. Transcontinental Bus System, Inc.

1 Marina operations.
2 Other than motor carrier.
3 No indication as to the source of income.
4 Trucks and trailers leased to oil companies.
5 Motor carriers--affiliated carriers.
6 Rent and service income and sale of land.
7 Relieved from filing motor carrier company consolidated financial statements.
& Garage Services, Inc. did not have operations, income, operating expenses nor pay any salaries.
• Sales from bituminous coal, wholesale and retail fuel oil, retail stores, natural gas, and lumber, etc.
10 Payment of $50,000 per year to Orblank Securities Corp. by Orange & Black Bus Lines, Inc. for
advice, consultation, financing and other services.

11 Short Line has ownership of the following companies: Hudson Transit Lines, Inc. (54.5 percent); Hudson Paramus Realty Corp. (50 percent); Hudson Mahwah Realty Corp. (50 percent); and Hudson Transit Corp. (50 percent).

12 Income from 4 Seasons Apartments.
13 Commissions on sale of insurance.
14 The Trailmar Corp. holds 100-percent ownership of the holding company-Trailhold, Inc.
15 Lease income on equipment.

18 Nonoperating income from such sources as rental of buildings, ranch lease, gain on liquidation,
insurance refund, oil royalty and miscellanous.

17 Truck, trailer and tractor leases and rentals.
18 Income from rents, leased equipment and storage.
19 Of the total figure shown for nonoperating income, $147,517 was derived from a management fee.
20 Rental of restaurant equipment.

21 Nonoperating income included $320 from vending machines, $3,154 from snack bar income,
$139,542 earnings from wholly-owned subsidiaries and $71,189 damages due from B. F. Goodrich.

1.

TABLE 3—RECENT PURCHASE OF REGULATED MOTOR CARRIERS BY NONTRANSPORTATION COMPANIES I

[blocks in formation]

Ohio). 2. Wyle Laboratories (El Segundo, Calif.). Manufactures and distributes electronic com

ponents. They also handle data processing

An international manufacturing and marketing

66.28 Midwestern extending to Denver and

the east coast.

[blocks in formation]

Purchasing company

Principal business activity

1. Banner Industries, Inc. (Cleveland, Diversified industrial products manufacturer.

systems. 3. Fuqua Industries (Atlanta, Ga.). Diversified industrial and commercial enter

prise—includes radio and television broad-
casting, photo processing and the manufacture
of agricultural equipment, construction prod-

ucts, metal buildings and lawnmowers.
4. Woods Corp. (Oklahoma City, Okla.) - Manufacturing-
5. V.Š. Industries, Inc.

organization.

6. Novo Industrial Corp. (New York A diversified manufacturing and service com-
City).

pany.
7. Essex Wire Corp-

Manufacturer of products used in the produc

tion, transmission, and control of electric current; and a manufacturer of plastics, aluminum extensions, and gas controls.

Limited to the east coast.
Philadelphia.
Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, Ohio,

Pennsylvania, West Virginia.

20.0

[graphic]
[blocks in formation]

1 Source: Review of Transport Topics.

2 Moody's Industrial Manual (New York), July 1968, and Moody's Transportation Manual (New
York), September 1968.

3 1967 carriers annual report to the ICC.

4 Novo Industrial Corp. also controls other transportation firms such as Fleet Carrier Corp. (an interstate common carrier of new trucks and buses moving from factory to dealer); Air Dispatch, Inc. (a domestic and international air freight forwarder) and 2 equipment leasing firms.

5 Not known.
6 National City Lines, Inc. also controls local bus lines and an auto distribution carrier.

7 The Pepsico family controls 1 of nations larger truck tractors, trailers and car leasing companies,
Lease Plan International, Inc. Lease Plan in turn owns National Trailer Convoy, Inc. (a common
carrier of mobile homes); Bear Transport, Inc. (a contract carrier hauling for Rheingold Breweries,
Inc.); Relay Transport, Inc. (a contract carrier hauling syrup to points in New York and south to
Virginia); _Whitehouse Trucking, Inc. (a hauler of prefabricated buildings and truck bodies); and
Flagstaff Trailer Sales, Inc. (which also has rights to haul prefabricated buildings).

8 Ramo, Inc., of San Antonio, Tex., is a portfolio company of Texas Capital Corp. of Georgetown,
Tex., a business investment firm.

[graphic]
« 이전계속 »