페이지 이미지

nothing more than a promise that he will see turns) rested upon any such sentimental considhim before he dies, Antonio, when he signs, erations. He makes a great parade about them though short of ready money for the moment, is when he replies to the remonstrances of Antostill in the full flow of his fortunes, and laughs at nio's friends, but Shakespeare has not forgotten the idea of being called on to pay the forfeit. It to inform us, through his confidential communiis true that when the danger fronts him, and can cations to himself and his own countrymen, what not be escaped, he meets it as patiently, and with his real motive was for this determination. In as much apparent indifference, as Ansaldo-mak- his first soliloquy, which is the expression of his ing no vain remonstrance, not complaining of the secret thoughts, he explains it frankly enough: rigor of the law, but justifying its execution, and content to die provided only that he may see

I hate him, for he a Christian, Bassanio again before he is put to death. But

But more for that in low simplicity

He lends out money gratis, and brings down there is a great difference between accepting

The rate of usance here with us in Venice. such a fate with equanimity when it is inevitable

If I can catch him once upon the hip, and deliberately incurring it when it is foreseen

I will feed fat the ancient grudge I bear him. and may be declined.

Then, again, the absolute inoffensiveness of And when he learns from Tubal, a wealthy HeAnsaldo, who does not seem to have uttered a brew of the same trade, that he has a good harsh word or entertained an unkind thought chance of “catching him upon the hip,” he reagainst anybody—with whom the very man who peats both the why and the how without any reis avowing his determination to take his life, serve or flourish. “I will have the heart of him though all Venice were offered him to spare it, if he forfeit; for, were he out of Venice, I can does not pretend any cause except his being the make what merchandise I will.” The Jew in greatest of the Christian merchants-seemed to the novel is a sentimentalist in comparison; he make the Jew's proceeding too monstrous to be wants “to be able to say that he has put to endurable by an English audience. Such malice death the greatest of the Christian merchants.” needed some provocation to make it credible Shylock is a mere utilitarian and man of business. enough for the human imagination, and a prob- Nor are we left in doubt as to the manner of able cause of provocation readily offered itself in Antonio's interference with Shylock's merchanthe disputes which must have occurred on the dise, and the arts by which he has “ thwarted his Rialto between two such men. A man who bargains” and “hindered him of half a million.” would enforce his contract for the pound of flesh As evidence of the fact itself, indeed, Antonio's in such a case was sure in all his transactions to word will not go for much with a modern apolotake advantages of the helpless, which a liberal gist for Shylock; but our question is what Shakeand beneficent merchant would be sure to be speare meant us to believe as to the fact, and of disgusted with and interfere to thwart. On such this Antonio's words are good evidence: occasions feelings would be expressed and words uttered which would not sting the less for being

He seeks my life : his reason well I know:

I oft delivered from his forfeitures just and well deserved. And that this was the

Many that have at times made moan to me : real history of the revengeful hatred on one side,

Therefore he hates me. and the contemptuous dislike on the other, we are made to understand at once, as soon as they That Shakespeare meant us to understand meet, by the irritating and sarcastic speech of that Shylock insisted upon the pound of flesh Shylock (finding himself for the first time at an because he wanted to remove from his path a advantage) and the angry retort which it pro- man who was in the habit of rescuing debtors vokes from Antonio. This revelation of their from his clutches by helping them to pay their respective feelings toward each other shows debts, does not in my mind admit of a doubt. ground enough for Shylock's malice to bring it That he did not mean us to regard it as an interwithin the range, not indeed of human sympathy, ference which Shylock had a right to resent, or which was not intended, but of possibility in hu- his mode of resenting it as a just retaliation, or man nature. We can imagine nature so diseased himself as entitled to one drop of pity for the and perverted as to be capable of it without miscarriage of his plot, or the delight of the byceasing to be human.

standers at his discomfiture—who (according to But, though we can accept these manifesta- the story), deriding the Jew, said, “ He who laid tions of dislike and scorn (the only wrongs he traps for others is caught himself”-as other has to complain of) as accounting for Shylock's than the expression of a natural, just, and healthy general disposition toward Antonio, we are not popular sentiment, appears to me no less certain. allowed to suppose that his determination to kill And, yet it is true that he has contrived to enlist him (upon which the whole action of the play on his behalf “a certain measure” of what Mr.

[ocr errors]


Hawkins calls “sympathy," but I should rather he found hints of in the novelist's account of the call respect. Why? Not because he was a lady's proceedings between her discovery of Andown-trodden Jew-he would have done as much saldo's position and her reception of him and for the most orthodox and prosperous Christian her husband at Belmonte. in the land, and has done as much for men as What need, then, have we to seek further, thoroughly depraved as lago and Edmund in either for the source of the plot, or the choice of “Lear”—but because, though not the hero of the subject, or the manner of its treatment? To the comedy, he had a conspicuous part in it, and hear our modern apologists, one would suppose Shakespeare never puts in a conspicuous part a that the argument of the play was the persecuman absolutely devoid of all qualities that can tion of a Jew by Christians; a description of it inspire respect or sympathy. Of the Jew in the for which, if the Venetian law had been represtory we know nothing except in relation to the sented in it as sanctioning the claim of a Chrisbond and the forfeiture, and in that part Shake- tian to cut the flesh out of the body of a few, speare has kept close to his original. But, hav- there would have been some color. As it is, to ing also to show him in his relation to other men, call it the persecution of a Christian by a Jew he endows him with such respectable qualities as would be nearer the mark. But the truth is, that are not incompatible with the work he has to do the question at issue has nothing to do with the -courage, intellect, eloquence, force of charac- question of religion. The law of Venice, in so ter, strength of will, attachment to his race and far as it is brought before us in the action, knows creed, and a show of respect for his law. I say a distinction between citizens and aliens, but not a “show”; for, though he makes a great profes- between Christians and Jews. It is administered sion of religious scruples, he never lets them in- strictly, without respect of race or creed. Nor is terfere with business. His religion forbids him there anything in the play, from the first scene to to eat or drink with Christians; and yet, when he the last, from which it can be inferred that a remembers that by “ feeding upon the prodigal Jew in Venice labored under any disadvantage, Christian " he may help to disable Antonio from political or social, as compared with a Christian. payment of his debt at the day, he overcomes On the contrary, pains have been taken to remind his objection to the smell of pork and consents us that there was none, all such inequality of to dine with Bassanio. He refuses payment of dealing being against the cardinal policy of the his debt in full, with two hundred per cent. inter- state. See act iï., scene 3: est for the few days' delay, because he dares not break his oath; he has sworn by the holy Sab


I am sure the Duke bath to have the pound of flesh and nothing Antonio. The Duke can not deny the course of law:

Will never grant this forfeiture to hold. else; to forbear would be to “lay perjury upon his soul,” which he will not do for Israel. But,

For the commodity that strangers have

With us in Venice, if it be denied, when he finds that he can not take the other

Will much impeach the justice of the state; man's life except at the peril of his own, he does

Since that the trade and profit of the city forbear; leaves his soul to settle with the perjury

Consisteth of all nations. as it can; is ready for any compromise, even though“ involving a renunciation of a cherished Shylock, it is true, who hates Antonio because faith.”* What he would not do for Israel he he is a Christian, naturally assumes that Antonio will yet do for himself. From all which I con- quarrels with his usances because he is a Jew. clude that Shakespeare did not mean us to be But that is only his own fancy; and even if it taken in by the solemnity of his professions, or had been true it would not have been in point; to look up to him as the martyr-hero of “an old, for his quarrel with Antonio was a private one, untainted religious aristocracy,” but only to re- with which the state had nothing to do. If gard him with a certain interest as a man quali- Shakespeare had meant his audience to feel that fied by nature for a better part than he has cho- the Hebrew race was suffering under Christian

oppression, he would surely have shown them If the characters of Bassanio, Antonio, and some case in illustration. Yet the only Hebrews Shylock are manifestly and directly derived from he shows us or tells us of are Shylock himself Ser Giovanni's story, it need hardly be said that and his friend Tubal-both of them rich, and at the Lady of Belmonte suggested the idea of liberty to make their bargains in their own way, Portia, every one of whose qualities, as we see and assisted by the laws to enforce the terms acthem brought out in the play by Shakespeare's cording to the letter, even when most iniquitous own hand — the generosity, the affection, the and unjustifiable. And what oppression by the spirit, the intellect, the gayety and playfulness— state has Shylock to complain of, either on his

[ocr errors]



own behalf or on that of his sacred nation ? * « The Theatre," December, 1879, p. 261. When he demands judgment on his bond, the


[ocr errors]


court warns him that if he insists on exacting a self; to escape from a house which to her was a penalty involving the death of a citizen he will hell, with only the “ merry devil ” Launcelot to himself have to pay the penalty prescribed by cheer it; from a father of whose manners she the law for shedding Christian blood-namely, was (not without reason and to her credit, though confiscation of land and goods. When he de- to her regret) ashamed; and from the chance, clines to press his demand on this condition, the should it suit him, of having to take “any of the court informs him that he has already incurred stock of Barrabas " for a husband; nor do many the penalty prescribed by the law for “ seeking of us object to see advantage taken by Antonio the life" of a citizen-namely, the forfeiture of of the pressure which the law enables him to put one half of his goods to the person whose life he on Shylock for the purpose of securing a comhad sought, of the other half to the state, and fortable provision for her. But we all feel that his life to the Duke's mercy. Of which penalty she ought to have left the ducats and jewels bethe court enforces so much only as amounts to hind; and the fact that Shakespeare allowed her the sequestration of one half of his property for to carry them off without a hint of disapprobathe benefit of his daughter; the rest being re- tion from anybody (there being no dramatic nemitted on two conditions-one, that he bind him- cessity for it) suggests a doubt whether in those self to leave her the whole after his death; the early days he was fully alive to the impropriety. other, that in the mean time he “ become a Chris- Perhaps the easy morality of the comic theatre tian," whatever that may mean. This is the full in all such questions—the large privilege which extent of the oppression, in consideration of which the young lovers have always enjoyed of deceivwe are called on to excuse him-as the repre- ing and overreaching the stern parent—had besentative victim of unreasoning prejudice against come so familiar as to hide from him the true naJews in general—for contriving by a fraudulent ture of the transaction; which in so tragic a contract to murder a rival; these the “inherited business as Shylock's revenge can not be regardand personal wrongs " by which“ his fine nature ed with the levity which comedy permits. But, has become so warped and soured.”.

however that may be, I can not doubt that the This strange notion, that the secret purpose effect would be much better in modern eyes if of the play was to expose the mischiefs of reli- Jessica were allowed to escape without the treagious intolerance, was probably suggested by the sure. The loss of his daughter to her race and last of the two conditions of pardon. And though faith would supply Shylock with as fair a motive I do not think that Shakespeare meant it to be so for vengeance; he could make as much noise taken—for I suspect that in the eyes of a Globe about it; and the secret that he really cared audience a Jew consenting to “become a Chris- more for the ducats than the daughter would not tian” was simply an infidel seeking admission be forced upon the knowledge of his admirers, into the fold and qualifying his soul for salvation who regard paternal tenderness as one of his -I admit that to modern ears it sounds like a most conspicuous virtues. Two lines struck out wanton insult, and (as producing on a modern from Jessica's part in the sixth scene of the secaudience an effect the very opposite to that which ond act, a few from Salanio's in the eighth, and was intended) ought to be left out. Nothing a few more in the interview with Tubal at the would be lost by the omission, and it would be beginning of the third act, would (without at all universally felt that Christianity could have no disturbing the action of the play) remove cominterest in enlisting such a recruit.

pletely our only remaining scruple as to the poetic The other condition has reference to an episode justice of the final settlement. For, though Shywhich is not to be found in the original story, but lock has escaped with a punishment which any one was introduced into the play partly to vary and who considers the character of his crime must enliven the action, and partly, perhaps, to account feel to be very far short of his desert, he is far for Shylock's determination to revenge himself on away in Venice among his money-bags, and does one Christian by giving him a just ground of not trouble us. We saw him baffled and disquarrel with another. In the course of which missed in the fourth act with general satisfaction, episode the moral sensibilities of a modern spec- and can leave him to meditate upon the example tator suffer a little shock, from which a judicious of Christian mercy which he owes to the generadapter might relieve him by the omission of a osity of his intended victim at the suggestion of few lines. Not that I would debar Jessica from the “wise young judge," and hope that he may seeking relief from her Jewish disabilities by the profit by it. In the mean time Antonio's fortunes nearest way. We are all glad to see her at liber- are happily restored by the safe arrival of his arty to choose her husband and her religion for her- gosies with all their merchandise, and everybody

is well pleased. * “ The Theatre," November, 1879, p. 194.

JAMES SPEDDING (Cornhill Magazine).


[blocks in formation]

THE 'HE scientific study of criminals and the phil. Not a case of forgery is tried but the expert in

osophic study of crimes is not merely an caligraphy and engraving is appealed to in order interesting, but a highly warrantable exercise of to aid the cause of justice, by the detection, intellect. Only through some such investigation through scientific means, of likenesses or differinto these subjects can a knowledge of the na- ences in handwriting, or of alterations and erature, cause, and cure of crimes be attained—if

, sures in disputed deeds or manuscripts. Evindeed, such knowledge in its perfect phases be ery case of homicide brings its array of mediever reached in human history. And only, when cal and surgical evidence, or its quota of chemaided by the skilled expert—the chemist, sur- ists, prepared to do battle for the truth. Even geon, physiologist, or engraver—and by the de- the identification of a corpus delicti may be a ductions and inductions science is able or pre- matter in which medical science alone has absopared to draw from any given set of circum- lute sway, and in which the skill of the medical stances, is Justice enabled to enter upon the jurist, with his testimony to the probable time pursuit of crime, and to make her name a terror and circumstances of death, may first point the to evil-doers. It is not our intention to follow, way in which detective science should travel. A at present, such experimenters as Mr. Francis blood-stain and its nature, when interpreted by Galton in his remarkable researches into the the microscopist, may convict the suspected, or conformation and configuration of the criminal may, on the other hand, set him free. And, in head, among other types of human character. many other ways and diverse fashions, the art of Readers interested in knowing what may be the detective may be shown to owe more to scidone in the way of a scientific study of charac- ence than most people unacquainted with the ter should peruse Mr. Galton's address to the routine of criminal investigation could readily imAnthropological Section of the British Associa- agine. tion for 1877. In that address will be found em- To select a simple case, and one, nevertheless, bodied some curious facts and inferences relative regarding which much popular misconception to the classification of groups and types of men exists, let us try to discover the place and power based on their habits of mind and physiognomy. of the microscope in medical jurisprudence. In By the application of an ingenious method of ob- such a study we may discover that certain powservation, in which, by an arrangement of mir- ers, popularly imagined to be at the beck and rors, four views of a person's head can be simul- call of the microscopist, are grossly exaggerated; taneously photographed, the full and complete while it may also be shown that the actual excomparison of types of head-conformation can tent of the microscopist's ability fully outweighs be effected. As the result of investigations con- the fallacies just alluded to. Chief among the ducted on this basis, Mr. Galton mentions that cases in which the microscope becomes of paraby physiognomy, together with the general con- mount importance, as an agent in the detection tour of the head, a practical arrangement of of crime, are those in which blood-stains, or criminal types becomes possible. Provided with marks of allied characters, and fragments of a large number of photographs of criminals, and clothing or hairs, require to be examined and by familiarizing himself with this collection, cer- referred to their exact source. An actual case tain natural classes of criminals became discern- may be related by way of exemplifying the conible ; and thus a scientific study of character may ditions demanding inquiry. A man was tried in assist in the determination of the results of crim- 1857, at one of our English assizes, for the supinal tendencies, and, through these, toward the posed murder of a companion. The dead man's amelioration of the race.

throat had been cut in such a fashion as to preThus much for the part Science promises to clude the idea of suicide. The prisoner had play in determining the causes of crime and been last seen in the company of the deceased, criminals. With the results of crime, however, and in his possession a knife stained with blood Science at present concerns herself much more was found. This knife was alleged by the prosenearly; and it is with the ways and means Sci- cution to be that with which the murder was ence brings to bear on the detection of crime committed, and the stains thereupon were althat we purpose chiefly to concern ourselves in leged to be those of human blood. The defense the present paper. Our newspapers familiarize explained the presence of these stains by assertus, day by day, with instances of the application ing that they were produced by cutting raw beef. of scientific methods to criminal investigation. Now, it may be asked, in what position is science

placed in such an issue as the present? Could The red corpuscles of human blood are round the microscopist, placed in the witness-box, and biconcave in form, each measuring from the swear to the identity of the stain with blood; one three-thousandth to the one four-thousandth and could he testify to its being human blood as of an inch in diameter. The white corpuscles distinguished from that of the ox? To the first are a little larger and attain a diameter averaging query, an affirmative answer must be returned. the one two-thousand five-hundredth part of an Chemical tests of great delicacy are known inch. Thus it may be safely asserted that, when whereby the presence of blood can be infallibly the microcopist is able to discern in any liquid detected. Mr. Sorby tells us that spectrum anal- those characteristic blood-globules, he may posiysis will reveal the presence of blood where the tively allege that the liquid in question is certainly stain is only the tenth of an inch in diameter, blood. When the further and equally important or where a quantity of the red coloring matter question of the kind of blood is submitted to the of blood, not exceeding the one hundredth part scientific observer, his answers should savor of of a grain, can be obtained. In so far as blood caution. The red corpuscles of man, unlike the itself and its mere presence are concerned, there white, do not possess a central particle or nucleus. are no scientific difficulties in the way of its exact They are, therefore, in physiological language, determination and separation from all other red- said to be “non-nucleated.” But it is noteworcolored stains. But, when we turn to the ques- thy that, in this latter feature, man's blood-globtion of the exact source of the blood-stains, we ules agree with those of all other mammals or find the powers of science to be limited in some quadrupeds. Every quadruped, in short, posdegree. In the case just alluded to, in which the sesses red blood-globules which want a central defense rested upon a statement that the blood- spot or nucleus. Moreover, all quadrupeds, exstains were obtained from beef, the fallacies of cept the camel-tribe, possess red blood-globules evidence which grossly departed from a scientific of circular shape; those of the camel being ellipstandard were exemplified. A chemist gave evi- tical in form. But, when we descend in the anidence, in which he alleged that the knife in ques- mal scale and pass to the birds, as most nearly tion had been immersed in living blood to its hilt, approaching quadrupeds, and from the birds to and that the blood was certainly not that of the reptiles and fishes, the blood-globules are found, ox or sheep. This testimony was offered, despite in these lower classes, to be not merely oval or the fact known to every physiologist that there elliptical in shape, but to be invariably nucleated exist no appreciable differences between the stain —that is, possessing each a central particle. of living blood and of blood from a recently killed With this zoological information at hand, we animal, and that the microscopist is as yet unable may be able to appreciate the power of the mito detect differences between the blood of man croscope as a detector of crime. In 1851, the and that of the ox or sheep sufficiently clear to defense, in a case of murder tried at the Essex enable him to decide their exact and specific na- Assizes, rested partly on the statement that the ture. Even spectrum analysis, with all its sub- blood-stains on the clothes of the prisoner were tilty of method and delicacy of research, can not derived from chicken's blood. In such a case the decide upon exact differences between new and microscopic evidence is invaluable, since the blood old blood-stains; nor can it enable the experi- of the bird will contain oval and nucleated globmenter to say if the blood be human or that of a ules; and, from an examination of these bloodlower animal. Fortunately, for the cause of jus- stains, the prisoner's statement in the case retice in the foregoing case, the crime was brought ferred to was proved to be false, the corpuscles home to the prisoner by evidence other than that being those of some mammal. Similarly, when of the chemist in question, and by testimony the late Professor Hughes Bennett, of Edinburgh, which depended on no fallacies of microscopic was confronted with a patient supposed to be testimony.

troubled with chest-disease of serious type, an To discover the limitations of science in such examination of the fluid blood supposed to have a case, we must make ourselves familiar with the come from the lungs revealed the presence of details of an elementary study in physiology. oval blood-globules. The patient's wonder may When a thin film of human blood is examined be better imagined than described when her imunder a high power of the microscope, it is seen posture was thus declared plain. Seeing, then, to present the appearance of a clear, watery fluid that the blood of quadrupeds is distinguishable —the serum and plasma of the physiologist—in from that of all other animals, the question yet which float an immense number of small, round remains, How far does microscopical evidence bodies, the blood-corpuscle These latter are proceed in determining human blood from that of two kinds, red and white; the red being by of other mammals? Here, leaving aside the sinfar the more numerous, and imparting, through gular and exceptional case of the camels and their their immense numbers, the red hue to the blood. neighbors with oval but non-nucleated globules,

« 이전계속 »