ÆäÀÌÁö À̹ÌÁö
PDF
ePub

sympathizing friends from among the best of our citizens, and their residence in the jail confers disgrace on none but those whose malice sent them there.

"Stone walls do not a prison make,

Nor iron bars a cage;
Minds innocent and quiet take
That for an hermitage."

Last night they had beds made up in the upper range of cells, where they slept. To-day they are in the upper room of the jailer's residence, where newspapers and writing facilities: have been furnished them.

Sheriff Wightman has treated them with kindness and courtesy; at the same time they are strictly confined within the walls, and no departure allowed from the regular discipline of persons in their condition.

We understand that this afternoon the prisoners will be visited by a large party of ladies. from the congregation of the Prospect Street Church, accompanied by many other ladies residing in the city.

To-morrow afternoon, about half past two o'clock, Professor PECK will preach to his "brethren in bonds," and such of the citizens as can be accommodated, in the jail.

Perhaps no better idea could be given of the state of feeling inside the prison, than may be gathered from the two extracts next following, the first of which is cut from the Evening Her ald, of Monday, April 18, and the second from the Morning Leader of the next day.

THE OBERLIN RESCUERS.
The Bond Preaching to the Free!

EXTRAORDINARY SCENE.

The jail on Saturday afternoon appeared more like a fashionable place of resort than a prison. Hundreds of ladies and gentlemen of the highest standing called on the Oberlin prisoners, and left them but few intervals during the day and evening for rest. On all sides they were greeted with assurances of sympathy and respect, mingled with severe comments on the extraordinary conduct of District-Attorney BELDEN, in ordering their arrest in violation of all precedent and in contempt of all decency and propriety.

On Sunday afternoon, according to previous notice, Professor PECK, one of the Oberlin Rescuers committed to jail to await trial, proceeded to address his brethren in bonds and such of the free as chose to come. The hour appointed was half past two o'clock, and at that time an immense crowd had gathered around the jail. The extensive jail yard was literally packed with human bodies, the space and street beyond filled, every roof and shed that afforded a prospect of the preacher, crowded, and the

windows of the new Court House building occupied. A large number of ladies were in the crowd, in addition to those admitted by the Sheriff to the private apartments of the jail. The crowd was of the highest respectability,

and numbered between six and seven hundred persons.

Professor Peck stood just inside the doorway of the jail, and from that point conducted the exercises, which he opened with a short prayer. The immense congregation then united in singing the hymn

My soul be on thy guard,

Ten thousand foes arise;

The hosts of sin are pressing hard
To draw thee from the skies."

A portion of Scripture was then read, a prayer offered, and the congregation sung the hymn

"Am I a soldier of the cross,

A follower of the Lamb?

And shall I fear to own his cause, Or blush to speak his name?" Professor Peck then read his text from Matthew 9: 9.

"And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom; and saith unto him, Follow me."

It is of the utmost importance to men that they clearly apprehend the great law of right. Do they know that law; they are prepared to ascend from the knowledge to virtue and wellbeing. Are they ignorant of it; that ignorance sinks them to deepest sin and woe.

There are but few, however, who can apprehend the law if it is stated to them in a merely dogmatic form; and fewer still are those who, knowing the law, can reduce it to details; who can frame for themselves a logical system of ethics.

The infirmity of the human intelligence which prevents its comprehending abstract rightness has been kindly recognized and provided for by our Great Father. Making account of it, He sent here his Son in the form of a man, to embody in an apprehensible way the law which lays its precept upon us all. In the discharge of this errand, the Good Teacher seldom taught duty in an abstract way. He simply said to men, as he did to the tax-gatherer in our text, Follow me.

The doctrine thus taught was easily comprehended. Untutored "common people heard him gladly," and even children learned from his life the truth they had need to know.

When the Divine messenger left the world, he commissioned and inspired men to put on lasting record the life in which he had displayed the law. So Matthew, the business-man, and Mark, the plain, farmer-like man, and Luke, the cultivated man, and John, the susceptible man, wrote the story; each telling it in his own way. Thus the world got glad-evangels, which, written from different points of study, agreed in well presenting the common theme

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

Nor could any thing ever divert him from accomplishing that will. When an arbitrary social law forbade his associating with publicans and sinners, he firmly kept on his own way, saying only, “I came not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance." And when civil law conflicted with the Divine will, by pronouncing the gospel he taught an illicit system, still did he not pause. He would preach, and his apology was declared in the comprehensive doctrine, "Render unto Cæsar the things which are Casar's, and unto God the things which are God's." Here, then, we get our first lesson. Divine will is to be paramount law with us. We must obey God always, and human law, social and civil, when we can.

Pursuing our study, we observe,

II. That the Divine will was well expounded in the life of Christ. It teaches us what that will is that it is not an abstraction, but a living principle, looking to most practical results. Describe the life in one word, and that word is love -"He went about doing good"—such is the Evangelist's own summary of the career of Jesus. Visiting the poor, healing the sick, cheering the disconsolate, such were his occupations. So it was that Christ set forth his idea of the Divine will.

And we may well note here that it was from his understanding of his Father's will that Jesus took the gauge of his relations to men. Ordinary ties those of consanguinity, for instance did not bind him as they did other men. The need of men, was what inclined him to them. As they were poor, or despised, or sorrowing, so did he stand close to them, and the greater their want the closer was his relationship to them.

This, then, for we pause here for another lesson, is always the Divine will that we love and do good to others, and that we fix our relationships and distribute our endeavors according not to inclination, but to the need of those for whose well-being we are called to

act.

Passing on, we notice,

III. That the spirit with which Christ carried out his Father's will, illustrates our duty.

His was never a grudging nor a self-seeking service. He gave up himself to his work. He assumed that he could not accomplish the will, which was his law, without inconvenience and loss to himself. So he went his way, expecting sorrow and pain. And when sorrow overtook him, he cheerfully bore it. The indignities with which the ungrateful compensated his love, did not disturb him. The buffetings and mockings with which his persecutors assailed him, as they crowned him with thorns, clothed him with purple, and put a sceptre of reed in his hand, did not move him. Serenely did he bear that keenest grief which he suffered, when, looking from the judgment-hall, he saw his most beloved disciple hiding in the distance, and his boldest one openly giving himself up to treachery. And the last words which trembled upon his dying lips were, "Father, forgive them, they know not what they do."

It will be well for us to note here that it was the spirit which Christ exhibited which barred the mischief which had otherwise come of his refusal to obey human law, when that law contradicted the Divine will. His disobedience of Cæsar was not divisive. The State did not suf fer from it. A spirit which is obviously benevolent and generous never divides. Selfishness divides society. The good-will, which Christ so well exhibited, unites men. It is when one follows Christ in this respect, that kindred and neighbors are gathered most closely to him, and that society about him becomes most compact. It is the God-obeying, loving spirit which Christ has communicated to those who follow him, which has given life to the social and political institutions under which we live, and are glad.

Let that spirit be ours. Let us be cheerful in doing our work. Let us, when we are wronged, give no place to vindictiveness, none to any desire but that of good will to all.

We find a fourth item of instruction with respect to our duty, in the manner of Christ, in looking for a reward for his labors and pains, not to any personal recompense, but to the good to others which was to follow that labor and pains. He never paused to ask whether his merit was recognized; whether the honor due him was rendered; whether he was to enjoy either present or posthumous fame. It was enough for him to know that the gospel he was preaching was in all time to be life to many souls; that his beneficence, maintained through all the ages, by those who should follow him, would minister good to the needy; that the poor and forlorn would be blessed by it; that those "sick and in prison" would be cheered by it, and that it would strike the iron from countless wretches unjustly bound. This was sufficient recompense for him. And such should be the only reward for well doing, which we should seek. Is toil appointed to us; are we called "to suffer for righteousness' sake?" it is enough

for us to know that what we do and bear will bless some child of want; that some poor wretch, who may never know our name or realize his obligation to us, will be cheered by the beneficent influence which we set on foot; that the ministry of love which we discharge, will, after we are gone hence, be to parched tongues a cooling drop.

We need pursue our subject no farther. It will surely leave with us these practical thoughts: 1. We are in all things to follow Christ. There is no position in which we shall need any other rule of life, than the example of the Lord who has gone before us. When duty is demanded, we need not look up an abstract law for our guidance; we have but to ask, "What would Christ do?" And when we can answer ourselves that Christ would do this thing or that, we need not hesitate to do it ourselves, even though human law or the customs of men should forbid.

2. We learn how and where we are to find Christ. It is not in the temple of worship only, or in the closet, that we are to seek our Lord. Do we go where the needy are, do we seek out, to bless, the wretch who is crunching his last crust, there shall we find Christ. Do we visit the sick-bed, from which fear of contagion has driven others, and there render needed offices, behold there will Christ present Himself. Do we take the panting fugitive from slavery by the hand, and help him on his weary way, pointing him to the Northern Star, so we shall presently find that "the Man of Sorrows" is also by his side. So let us seek our Lord, going as He always did, when He was here, where the neediest are.

And, finally, let us learn from our subject to be satisfied, in all our trials and labors, to be as our Master was. Must we submit to toil- did not He labor to utmost weariness? Are we paid for our self-sacrifices by the ingratitude of those we bless-was not He repulsed even by those He healed? Are we persecuted for righteousness' sake, and taunted and buffeted by those who are in power-has not He been in the judgment hall before us, and was not He crowned with thorns, and did not deriding persecutors mockingly rail at Him as the King of the Jews?

And when we have done all and suffered all, let us rejoice to know that we shall have our reward in the healing which shall come through us to some wounded spirit, and let us go cheerfully and joyously on our way, keeping in view Him who has trod the same weary way before us, assured that as His works followed Him so our works will follow us, and that the sons of sorrow will be gladdened by us even when our hands have long mouldered to dust.

At the conclusion of the sermon a prayer was offered, the doxology sung, and the congregation dispersed, very many previously passing through the jail and shaking hands with the prisoners.

The remark was general in the crowd, that were the prisoners in the custody of the U. S. officers and Southern slave catchers, instead of the friendly care of the County Sheriff, the jail walls would present but a frail barrier between a liberating crowd and the incarcerated prisoners. The numbers and the spirit for such an undertaking were both present, but under the circumstances it was well known such a measure was not necessary.

THE INCARCERATED. The twenty Oberlin citizens who are incarcerated in the County Jail appear to enjoy life as well as they could be expected to do under the circumstances. On Saturday they had an almost ceaseless round of callers and friends, and President Buchanan hardly holds greater levees than did these men on Saturday afternoon. A large number of ladies made the "reception room (12 feet by 18) cheerful and happy with their bright smiles and lively conversation. There was no lack of merriment and laughter, for even the "stern Oberlin saints " can enliven the routine of life with a hearty laugh when occasion calls for it. The spirits of the prisoners can be seen by the following correspondence which was written for the Plaindealer, but, being accidentally left out, was solicited by us :

A VOICE FROM THE JUG. My good friend Gray asked me to write this, and said he was going to head it

"Hark! from the tombs,"

so I shall save him the trouble, and add for his benefit the remainder of this solemn stanza; here is the whole :

"Hark! from the tombs a doleful sound;
My ears attend the cry;

Ye living men come view the ground
Where you must shortly lie."

sen

Apropos to this sacred quotation, scme one. in the farther part of the room is just now saying that Mr. Anderson Jennings, to whom we rascals are especially indebted for our comforta ble quarters actually is, as Attorney Belden intimated, a distinguished member of a Hard Shell Baptist Church in the chivalrous State of Kentucky! Comments upon such a statement are quite unnecessary. Every man to his own inferences. But you are aching for items. sation items. How came we in jail, and how do we feel here? Came we the defendants here by order of the Honorable U. S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, on motion of the U. S. District-Attorney. The immediate provocation of the imprisonment seemed to be the extraordinary position taken by the defendants in declining to accept as competent to decide upon their liberty the jury which had just rendered a verdict of guilty against one of their number. This Mr. Belden thought so impertinent as to destroy all his previous confidence in us. Hitherto we have come

and gone upon our word. But now we are safe only within stone walls. Not feeling very guilty, we do feel very happy. We are in jail, and though treated with kindness, are none the less prisoners, for Sheriff Wightman is a faithful officer as well as a gentleman, and allows no personal feelings to interfere with the rigid discharge of his official duties; and here in jail, in the beautiful city of Cleveland, in the Free State of Ohio, we shall quietly lie, not for the crime of violating the act of 1850, not for the charge or suspicion of so doing, ing to intrust our liberty to the keeping of twelve men who had just announced under oath, their fixed opinion of the merits of our case. Now how do we look and feel?

16th. This article is selected as conveying precisely the impressions upon which THE TWEN

TY acted.

Thirty-Seven Free Citizens of Ohio consigned to a Jail because they Refused to be Tried by a Jury that had Prejudged their Cases.

The Wellington-Oberlin rescue case assumed a new phase on Friday, and we must occupy a brief space, although our columns have of late but for declin- been filled with the details of the trial of Bushnell, in reviewing the history of this matter, and in calling attention to the unprecedented and unpardonable course of District-Attorney BELDEN. We do not know how to characterize the vindictiveness, the malice, the venom, with which the Prosecution calls for the vengeance of the law upon these men.

The glass is passing freely around, backed by a huge pitcher. The contents are as good as the Cleveland Reservoir can furnish, but still a little behind Oberlin wells. The Deacon brought an armful of exchanges just after tea, and the genial Junior of the Leader came with as many more an hour later. Mr. Benedict had already supplied us the Evening Herald. The literarily inclined are therefore buried in news, and the rest chatter quietly between. A steady current of callers eddies through our room, leaving a cheerful sediment of anecdote, witticism, discussion, argument, querying, and comfort. Very respectable callers these are, too, without exception. Barristers, Editors, Legislators, Merchants, and Clergymen. And now comes our courteous Marshal Johnson to unite counsels with the Sheriff, the Jailer and the ladies, for the lodging of so unexpected and serious an addition to the number of the public guests. Next comes a friend with an armful of books. Then a gentleman and some ladies. Really, this is a lively evening. But, alas! every echo of our laughter rings with the hollow premonition of a sundering Union, a disaffected South, and an excited community. What shall be did? Something to quiet the distracted narves, something to throw another hoop about the parting Union, something to make still more secure the slippery two-legged property of our unfortunate southern neighbors.

But they are laughing at me for writing for the Plain-Dealer, and your readers will laugh so much more yet to see such an abolitionist, incendiary, Freedom-shrieking, Kansas-humbug, Republican, Oberlin article in your columns, that I may as well stop off. If you feel infected, fumigate yourself with sulphur, dear reader, and be in Court on Monday.

CUYAHOGA COUNTY JAIL, Friday Evening, April 15, 1859.

DUNGEONER.

As some individuals seem to have misapprehended the true grounds of the committal to prison, it has been thought best to insert in this connection an editorial which appeared in the Cleveland Herald of Saturday evening, April

Let us go back to the finding of these indictments, merely to remind our readers that one of the men allowed by the Prosecution to sit on the Grand Jury, was Mr. Boynton, the father of the boy, who, for twenty pieces of silver, was hired to deceive and decoy a miserable, ignorant black man into the hands of his captors. Here was the first unblushing outrage upon propriety, yes, upon decency.

and

The next step in this mockery of fair and honorable dealing, was the empanelling of a Petit Jury, every man of whom was an adherent of the Democratic party, and one of them a Deputy United States Marshal. We do not say law was violated by this, but we do say every right-minded person will agree with us that this was ungenerous, unfair, and an utter violation of the dignity and magnanimity becoming the professional character and position of a high public prosecutor. It was fit only for a four-corner Justice's trial on a horse warranty question.

us

The trial was had on the case against Bushnell, and the jury, very summarily, found him guilty. We are not disposed to impugn the integrity of these jurors: they acted under the solemnity of an oath each had the intelligence to comprehend, and the responsibility of which they ought fully to feel. How those men could say for by their verdict they have so said — that those two Kentucky slave-catchers told the truth about that power of attorney, while some half dozen of as good citizens as Lorain County contains were guilty of flat, deliberate, downright perjury, is a matter for them to settle with their own consciences. We do not arraign them for their opinion upon that subject, but proceed to the scene which ensued upon the rendition of their verdict.

The question came up as to the trial of the other cases, and the District-Attorney, in his vindictiveness, his malignity towards the remaining defendants, insisted that each of them should be tried by that same jury a jury that under the solemnity of their oaths, had prejudged all these cases.

Let it be borne in mind that this jury, by its | part of the Government. The defence dismissed verdict, had found that there was concert of ac- their Counsel, and refused to stultify themselves tion at Wellington, on the part of the crowd of by appearing to accede to such a legal outrage which these defendants were a component part. upon their rights. Then it was the District-AtThat, of course, prejudged the vital point in the torney exultantly claimed his privilege of orderremaining cases. ing Bushnell into the custody of the Marshal; and he did more, he moved that those persons who were at large, upon their own recogni

But the outrage upon judicial propriety and decency, can only be appreciated by adding this fact, that the jury which sat upon Bush-zances, be taken into custody. After their nell's case, was a“ Struck Jury.” What lawyer ever heard of a “Struck Jury" for an entire term of Court? We have it from the most experienced gentlemen of our bar, from those who for years have sat upon the Bench, who have grown gray in the profession, that in the profession, that a “Struck Jury" is always confined to the one case to try which it was empanelled. Ordinarily the term dockets do not embrace cases resting upon like facts, and in such case the claim of the DistrictAttorney that the "Struck Jury" is for the term, while it would be novel, would not, as a matter of course, be glaringly unjust; but in this instance it is monstrous.

When the defendants found that the DistrictAttorney, in his madness, was determined to put them through the wretched farce of a pretended trial, while the verdict of guilty had been already pronounced by the Jury before whom they were to be arraigned, they abandoned their defence, and Judge SPALDING said, in behalf of the defendants, that if compelled to go before this Jury, they would introduce no witnesses, and the trial would be solely on the

names were called, and they had entered the box assigned them by the U. S. Marshal, Judge SPALDING moved, in behalf of the defendants, that an entry be made on the Journal, showing the several recognizances cancelled. This was done, or ordered to be done by the Court. Subsequently, the District-Attorney applied for an order that these defendants be admitted to bail, at any time, by entering into recognizances, with sureties to the satisfaction of the Clerk. The Judge made the order, but distinctly said no bail or sureties would be required; that is, they might renew their own individual recognizances, if they saw fit. Then the vengeance of the District-Attorney seemed for a moment satisfied, and these men were marched to our jail, where they lie incarcerated. And for what? Why, for refusing to be tried by a Jury that had prejudged their cases.

That is the length and breadth of this matter, and we rest it here, begging the people of Ohio to ponder upon this outrage, and to answer to themselves this question: What is the trial by Jury worth in Ohio?

CHAPTER THIRD.

To gratify the reader, it is made a study, throughout this volume, to avoid repetitions. The testimony given on Mr. LANGSTON'S trial will usually be introduced in this chapter only when it materially differs from that given on the trial of Mr. BUSHNELL. The compiler acknowledges his indebtedness to Mr. BACKUS and Mr. GRISWOLD, for the use of their notes of the testimony on this trial, from which his selections are mainly drawn. The indefatigable reporters of the Leader and of the Herald will occasionally recognize "familiar passages' " in this as in other Chapters, for the privilege of using which, they need not be told he gladly makes grateful acknowledgments.

dent upon the labors of others for its history. His deep personal regret that he cannot hold himself alone chargeable with any errors of omission or commission that may be detected herein, is however sensibly mitigated by the sincere pleasure the opportunity affords him to become the recipient of the numberless kind offices of friends.

So much of the testimony as is presented in this chapter may be received with every confidence in its accuracy; and it is believed that but little, if any, of importance has escaped selection.

TRIAL OF CHARLES LANGSTON.

FIRST DAY.-MONDAY, APRIL 18, 1859.
Court convened at 9 o'clock. On the read-

A chain of untoward circumstances, beginning with our incarceration, and ending with the foundation of this work itself, so interrupting of the Journal for Friday, in which it is ed the compiler's personal attendance upon stated that Charles Langston had appeared and Court during this trial, that he is mainly depen-given up his recognizance, on his own free will

« ÀÌÀü°è¼Ó »