TABLE OF CONTENTS.

PAGE

vii

Table of Cases, Proceedings, and Opinions Reported,

Table of Citations in Opinions,

The Interstate Commerce Act,

Reports of Cases, Proceedings, and Opinions,

Appendix I, Rules of Practice of the Commission,

Appendix II, Amendment to Rules of Practice,

Appendix III, English Statutes,

Appendix IV, Noie on American and English Decisions,

Index,

TABLE

OF

Cases, Proceedings and Opinions Reported.

INTERSTATE COMMERCE REPORTS, VOL. I.

717

A.

Board of Trade, Lincoln v. Chicago, B. &
Q. R. R. Co.

647
Adams Express Co., Re
456 0. Missouri Pac. R. R. Co.

648 Address by Senator Cullom 300 Opelika, Re

314 Aiken, Ouachita & M. River Packet Co. 0. Boards of Trade Union v. Chicago, M. & (U. S. Sup. Ct.) (Opinion) 379

St. P. R. Co. (Opinion) 608 Alabama, Smith v.(U.S. Sup. Ct.), Opinion) 804 Boston & A. R. R. Co. v. Boston & L. R. Alabama Great S. R. Co., Rice v.

604

R. Co. 291, 400, (Opinion) 500 Allegheny River Coal etc. Asso. 0. Alle

Boston Chamber of Commerce o. gheny Valley R. R. Co. 604

(Opinion) 754 Allegheny Valley R. Ř. Co., Allegheny Boston & L. R. R. Co., Boston & A. R. R. River Coal etc. Asso. v.

604

Co. v.

291, 400 (Opinion) 500 Allen o. Louisville, N. A. & C. R. Co. 586, Vermont State Grange etc. 0. - . 408, (Opinion) 621

(Opinion) 500 American Emigrant Co. 0. Trunk Lines 483 Boston Chamber of Commerce o. Boston & Annapolis, W. & B. R. R. Co., Re 315

A. R. R. Co.

(Opinion) 754 Armour v. Baltimore & O. R. R. Co. 464

0. Lake Shore R. R. Co. 354, 391, 0. Lake Shore & M. S. R. R. Co. 314

462, 604, (Opinion) 754 Associated Wholesale Grocers of St. L.O.

v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. R. Missouri Pac. R. Co. (Opinions) 321,

Co.

(Opinion) 754

393 Boston, Export Trade of, Re - 18, (Opinion) 25 Association, Allegheny River Coal etc., o. Bowman v. Chicago & N. R. Co. (U. S. Allegheny Valley R. R. Co. 604

Sup. Ct.)

(Opinion) 823 Business Men's of Minnesota, o. Chi- Brady o. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. 649, 810 cago & N. R. Co.

483, 589 Brunswick & W. R. R. Co., Slappey v. - 675 0. Chicago, St. P., M. & o. Buffalo, N. Y. & P. R. R. Co., Rice v. R. R. Co.

483, 591 Burlington & M. R. R. Co., Burton Stock St. Louis Millers, Re

22
Car Co. o.

329 Southern Railway & Steamship, Re - 15,

Beatrice Board of Trade v. 701 17, 21, 76, (Opinion) 278 Raymond Bros. v.

592 Pyle & Sons o. 486 Friend v.

582 Atchison, T. & S. F. R. R. Co., Re

Lincoln Board of Trade o.

647 Atlanta, Proceedings at

76 Burlington, C. R. & N. R. Co., ManufactAtlantic Coast Line, New York, P. & N.

urers & Jobbers Union v. 630 R. R. Co. o.

447, 582 Burnside, Barron o. (U. S. Sup. Ct.), Ayres & Fell v. Union Pacific R. R. Co. 397

(Opinion) 295 Burton Stock Car Co. v. Burlington & M. B.

R. Co.

(Opinion) 329

v. Chicago & A. R. Co. (Opinion) 329 Baltimore & N. Y. R. R. Co., Decker o.

v. Chicago, B.& N.R. Co. (Opinion) 329 (U. S. Ct. Ct.) (Opinion) 434 v. Chicago,B.& Q.R.R. Co.(Opinion) 329

Stockton v. (U. S. Ct. Ct.), (Opinion) 411 v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co.
Baltimore &0. R. R. Co., Armour v. 464

(Opinion) 329 Leggett v.

396, 684 0. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Čo. Riddle, Dean & Co. v. (Opinion) 701, 778

(Opinion) 329 Thurber v.

397

v. Cleveland, C. C. & I. R. Co.
Walker ?
649

(Opinion) 329 Barron v. Buruside (U. S. Sup. Ct.)

v. Hannibal & St. J. R. Co. (Opinion 329

(Opinion) 295 0. Lake Shore & M. S. R. Co. Beatrice Board of Trade v. Burlington &

(Opinion) 329 M. R. R. Co.

701

v. Missouri Pac. R. Co. (Opinion) 329 0. Chicago, K. & N. R. Co.

58

C.

| Coal Exchange, Ohio o. Wisconsin Cent.
R. Co.

793, 812 California, Fruit Interests of, Re

23 Coast Line, Atlantic, New York, P. &N. Canal Co., Delaware & H., Griffith, Owen

R. R. Co. v.

447, 582 & Co. o.

396, 483 Columbus & W. R. Co., Harwell o. 494, Cape Girardeau & S. W. R. R. Co., Mis

(Opinion)631
souri & I. Tie & Lumber Co. Commercial Exch. of Phila. 0. Cincinnati,
0.

292, 607
I. St. L. & C. R. Co.

778 Car Co., Burton Stock, Chicago, B. & Q.

0. Cleveland, C.C. & I. R. Co. 778
R. R. Co. o.
(Opinion) 329 v. Erie Despatch

778, 821
Worcester Excursion 0. Pennsyl-

v. Indiana, B. & W. R. Co.

778
vania R. Co.

811
v. Nickel Plate Line

778 Carr, Indiana, ex rel., 0. Woodruff Sleep

v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.

778 ing & Parlor Coach Co. (Sup.

v. Philadelphia & R. R. R. Co.

778
Ct. Ind.)
(Opinion) 798

v. Pittsburgh, C. & St. L. R. Co. 778 Central Pac. R. Co., Martin o.

597
v. Traders Dispatch

778 Central R. R. Co., Slappey v. 675, 812 v. Union Line

778 Chesapeake, O. & S. W. Ř. Co., Rice v. 482

v. White Line

778 Chicago & A. R. Co., Burton Stock Car

Commission, Jurisdiction of,

73
Co. 0. -
(Opinion) 329
Procedure of

• 410
0. Pennsylvania R. R. Co. 291, 293, Rule as to Applications to

15 (Opinion) 357 Commonwealth, Gloucester Ferry Co. o. Chicago & G.T.R. Co., Larrison 0.

(U. S. Sup. Ct.) (Opinion) 382
(Opinion) 369

List 0. (Sup. Ct. Pa.) (Opinion) 784
Michigan Cent. R.R. Co.v. (Opinion) 369 Conductors, Railway, Order of, Re - (Opinion) 18
Michigan Congress Water Co. v. 797 Corson v. State (U. S. Sup. Ct.) (Opinion) 50
Swift o.

294 Cotton Exchange, New Orleans, v. New Chicago & N. R. Co., Bowman 0. (U. S.

Orleans, C. & T. P. R. Co. 648
Sup. Ct.)
(Opinion) 823 Cotton Gin Co., Gullett, Re

63
Business Men's Asso.of Minn.v. 483, 589 Council v. Western & A. R. R. Co. - 292,
Rend o.
793, 812

355, (Opinion) 638 Chicago & N.W.R. Co.,Milwaukee Cham

Cullom, Senator, Address by

300
ber of Commerce v.
795 Crews 6. Richmond & D. R. R. CO. -

490 Chicago, B. & N. R. Co., Burton Stock

(Opinion) 703
Car Co. v.
(Opinion) 329
v. Virginia Midland R. Co.

490
Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co., Burton Stock
Car Co. o.

(Opinion) 329
Dexter o.

598
Lincoln Bd. of Trade v.
647 Daily Order of Business

73
Raymond Bros. 0.

592 Decker v. Baltimore & N. Y. R. R. Co. Chicago, K. & N. R. Co., Beatrice Board

(U. S. Ct. Ct.) (Opinion) 434 of Trade v.

701 Delaware & H. Canal Co., Griffith, Owen Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., Boards of

& Co. o.

396, 483
Trade Union v. (Opinion) 608

Thacher o. 24, 317, (Opinion) 356
Burton Stock Car Co. v. (Opinion) 329 Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., Leggett o. 396
Milwaukee Chamber of Commerce

Thurber o.

397
795
Walker v.

649 Raymond v. 474, (Opinion) 627 Delaware State Grange v. Delaware R. R. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co., Burton Stock

Co..

649 Car Co.o.

(Opinion) 329 0. New York, P. & N. R. R. Co. 649 Manufacturers & Jobbers Union 0. 630 0. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.

649 0. New York C. & H. R. R. R. Co. - 291, 0. Philadelphia, W. & B. R. R. Co. 649

293, (Opinion) 351 Denver & R. G. Ř. R. Co., Friend v. 582 Chicago, St. Louis & P. R. Co., Swift v.

294
Lincoln Board of Trade o.

647 Chicago, St. Paul, M. &0. R. Co., Re - 24, 63 Raymond Bros. 0.

592 Business Men's Asso. of Minn. 0. 483, Department of Statistics

354
591 Derby o. St. Paul, M. & M. R. Co. 315
Fulton v.

(Opinion) 375 Detroit Board of Trade v. Grand Trunk
Harding o.
(Opinion) 375
R. Co.

698, 701 Cincinnati, I. St. L. & C. R. Co., Com

0. New York Cent. & H. R. R. R. mercial Exch. of Phila. 0, 778

Co.

701 Cincinnati, N. 0. & T. P. R.Co., Rice o. 480, Detroit, G. H. & M. R. R. Co. Re

17 481, 604, 605, (Opinion) 722 Milwaukee Chamber of ComCircular as to Short Haul Rates 601

774 Classification of Railroad Freights, Re 317, Dexter o. Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co.

598 355 Dressed Meat Cases

294, 303, 464 Cleveland, C. C. & I. R. Co., Burton Dunbar's Sons & Co. 0. Louisville & N. Stock Car Co. o. (Opinion) 329

R. R. Co..
Commercial Exch, of Phila. 0.

778 Coal Co., Providence o. Providence & W.

E.
R. R. Co. 316, (Opinion) 363
Coal Creek & New R. R. R. Co., ck o. - 498, East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. Co., Farrar v. 600,
(Opinion) 775

(Opinion) 764 INTER S.

D.

merce o.

· 592

East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. Co., Heck v. 498, | Heck v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. Co. - 498, (Opinion) 775

(Opinion) 775 Pyle v.

600, (Opinion) 767 v. Knoxville & 0. R. R. Co. 498, Rice o. 479

(Opinion) 775 Western & A. R. Ř. Co. v. 488 v. Richmond & D. R. Co.

498, Emigrant Co., American, Trunk Lines v. 483

(Opinion) 775 Erie Despatch, Commercial Exch. of

v. Richmond & W. P. Terminal & Phila. 0.

778, 821

Warehouse Co. - 498, (Opinion) 775 Erie R. R. Co., Walker v.

649 Hennick, Re (Sup. Ct. D. C.). (Opinion) 66 Evans o. Oregon Railway & Nav. Co. 314, Holbrook 0. St. Paul, M. & M. R. Co. 315, 326, (Opinion) 641

(Opinion) 323 Export Trade of Boston, Re - 18, (Opiniou) 25 Hot Springs o. Western North Carolina R. Express Companies, Re 22, 317, 355, 448,

R. Co.

316 451, 456, (Opinion) 677 Howell o. Lehigh & Hudson R. R. R. Co. 467

0. New York, L. E. & W. R. R. Co. 467 F.

v. New York, O. & W. R. Co. 467

v. New York, S. & W. R. R. Co. 467
Fargo v. Stevens (U. S. Sup.Ct.) - (Opinion) 51
Farrar v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. Co. - 600,

I.
(Opinion) 764
v. Norfolk & W. R. R. Co. 600, Illinois Cent. R.R. Co.,Riceo.

482, (Opinion) 764

(Opinion) 722 Ferry Co., Gloucester, o. Commonwealth Indiana, B. & W. R. Co., Commercial of Pa.(U.S. Sup.Ct.) : (Opinion) 382

Exch. of Phila. o.

778 Filing Copies of Joint Tariff by Traffic Indiana, ex rel. Carr, v. Woodruff Sleeping Combinations

76

& Parlor Coach Co. (Sup. Ct. Fish & Fisheries, United States Commis

Ind.)

(Opinion) 798 sion of, Re

606 Indianapolis & St. Louis R. Co., Swift v. 294 Fitchburg R. R. Co., Thacher v. 24, 317, Indian Supplies, Re

22 (Opinion) 356 Inmates of National Homes, Re - (Opinion) 75 Fitzpatrick, State v. (Sup. Ct. R. I.) 713 Interstate Commerce Act, The

3 Flint & P. M. R. R. Co., Milwaukee Iowa Barb Steel Wire Co., Re - 21,(Opinion) 605

Chamber of Commerce v. 774, 792
Fourth Section, Re Suspension of - 15, 23, 25,

J.
27, 62, 63, 72, 76, 278, 292 293 Jackson v. St. Louis, A. & T. R. Co. - 476, 599
Freights, Re Classification of

317, 355 Friend v. Burlington & M. R. R. Co. 582

James, Greenville & N. 0. Packet Co. v. 0. Denver & R. G. R. R. Co.

(U. 8. Ct. Ct.) (Opinion) 599

New Orleans & M. Packet Co. v. 0. Southern Pac. R. Co.

582 Fruit Interests of California, Re

(U. S. Ct. Ct.) 23

(Opinion) 599 Fulton o. Chicågo, St. P. M. & 0. R. R.

Planters Transportation Co. v.(U. S.

Ct. Ct.)
Co. -
(Opinion) 375

(Opinion) 599 Joint Tariffs, Order as to Publication 598 G.

Jurisdiction of Commission

582

73

Georgia R. R. Co., Heard v.

314, 493,

K.
(Opinion) 719
Gloucester Ferry Co. o. Commonwealth of

Kankakee & S. R. R. Co., Manufacturers
Pa. (Ú. S. Sup. Ct.) (Opinion) 382

& Jobbers Union v.

630 Grand Trunk R. Co., Detroit Board of Keith v. Kentucky Cent. R. R. Co. 316, Trade v. 698, 701

(Opinion) 601 Greenville & N. 0. Packet Co. 0. James

v. Louisville & N. R. R. Co

316, (U. S. Ct. Ct.) (Opinion) 599

(Opinion) 601 Griffith, Owen & Co. o. Delaware & H.

v. Pittsburg, C. & St. L. R. Co.. - 316, Canal Co. 396, 483

(Opinion) 601 Gullett Cotton Gin Co., Re

63 Kenton Wheel Club of Covington, Re 23

Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v. LouisH.

ville & N. R. R. Co. 703, 715

Kentucky Cent. R. R. Co., Keith v. 316, Hannibal & St. J. R. Co., Burton Stock

(Opinion) 601 Car Co. o.

(Opinion) 329 Ketron v. Norfolk & W. R. R. Co. 483, 588 Ilanniford, Little Rock & F. S. R. Co. v. Knowles v. Ohio & M. R. R. Co.

675 (Opinion) 580 Knoxville & 0.R.R. Co.,Heck v.

498, Harding v. Chicago, St. Paul, M. & O. R.R.

(Opinion) 775 Co.

(Opinion) 375 Koehler, Receiver of 0. & C. R. Co., Ex Hartford & N. Y. Transp. Co.v.New York

parte (U. S. Ct. Ct.).

28, & N. E. R. R. Co. 314

Öpinion) 317
Harwell v. Columbus & W. R. Co. 494,

L.
(Opinion) 631
0. Western R. Co. .

494 Lake Shore & M. S. R. R.Co., Armour o. 314 Heard o. Georgia R. R. Co.

314, 493, Burton Stock Car Co.o. - (Opinion) 329 (Opinion) 719 Nelson, Morris & Co.o.

314 Heck o.Coal Creek & New R. R. Co. - 498,

Scofield o.

593 (Opinion) 775 Swift v.

294