... subjects of trade and barter offered in the market as something having an existence and value independent of the parties to them. They are not commodities to be shipped or forwarded from one State to another, and then put up for sale. They are like... United States Reports: ... and Rules Announced at ... - 411 페이지저자: United States. Supreme Court - 1908전체보기 - 도서 정보
| Kevin L. Lybeck, H. Bruce Shreves - 1998 - 424 페이지
...Virginia, 75 US 168. 183 (1869) ("Issuing a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce. . . Such contracts are not interstate transactions, though...transactions, and are governed by the local law."); see also, 15 USC §§ 101 1 - 1015 (1994) (Enacted in 1945, the McCarron-Ferguson Act provides, among... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 2006 - 164 페이지
...contracts were not articles of commerce in any proper meaning of the word. Such contracts, they ruled, were not interstate transactions (though the parties may be domiciled in different states the policies did not take effect until delivered by the agent in a state, in this case Virginia). They were deemed,... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - 1913 - 1568 페이지
...another, and then put up for sale. They arc like other personal contracts between parties which are completed by their signature and the transfer of the...transactions, and are governed by the local law. They do [504] not constitute a part of the commerce between the states any more than a contract for the purchase... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1654 페이지
...the latter. These contracts are not articles of commerce in any proper meaning of the word * » *. Such contracts are not interstate transactions, though...until delivered by the agent in Virginia. They are, tien, local transactions, and are governed by the local law. They do not constitute a part of the commerce... | |
| 1923 - 806 페이지
...another and then put up for sale. They are like other personal contracts between parties which are completed by their signature and the transfer of the...parties may be domiciled in different States. The ruling as to a contract of fire insurance was afterwards applied to a contract of marine insurance... | |
| 144 페이지
...contracts were not articles of commerce in any proper meaning of the word. Such contracts, they ruled, were not interstate transactions (though the parties may be domiciled in different states the policies did not take effect until delivered by the agent in a state, in this case Virginia). They were deemed,... | |
| Michael Angelo Musmanno - 1929 - 276 페이지
...issuing a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce," and that the contracts of insurance " are not interstate transactions, though the parties may be domiciled in different States." This principle has been reaffirmed in other cases.87 In the face of these decisions it is obvious that... | |
| |