...Brten v. New York etc. RR Co., 109 NY 297. Or, as expressed in an English case, "where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is euch as, in the ordinary course of things, docs not happen if those who have the management use proper...

...(/), in these terms: — " There must be reasonable evidence of negligence. " But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant...management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of (e)...

...reasonable evidence of negligence, but where the thing (meaning the thing which caused the injury) isshown to be under the management of the defendant or his...management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absense of explanation by the defendant, and that the accident arose from want of...

...that " where the thing" (goods suspended over the pavement, which fell and injured the plaintiff) " is shown to be under the management of the defendant...management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care."...

...doctrine was thus laid down: "There must « some reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant...management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs...

...There *«iu3tbe reasonable evidence of negligence. •Bat, «hen the thing is shown to be under "lie management of the defendant or his "servants, and...management use " proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, *m the absence of explanation by the de" tendant, that the accident arose from want •of...

...negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the de16 C. of L. — 29 fendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the...management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, In the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs...

...principle was thus formulated by Mr. Chief Justice ERLE in the following language: "Where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, under an ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...

...The doctrine, as applied by the court there, is based upon reasoning like this : Where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant...management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care....

...thus laid down: "There must besóme reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown lo be under the management of the defendant or his servants,...management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs...