검색 이미지 지도 Play YouTube 뉴스 Gmail 드라이브 더보기 »
로그인
도서 The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant...에 대해 검색한 77개 도서 중 71 - 77
" The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed in immediate connection with those from whose negligence he might suffer; but because the implied contract... "
A Selection of Cases on Agency - 791 페이지
저자: Eugene Wambaugh - 1896 - 1061 페이지
전체보기 - 도서 정보

The Northwestern Reporter, 48권

1891
...which does not exist. The master In the case supposed Is not- exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when...contract of the master does not extend to indemnify tlip servant against the negligence of any one but himself; * * * and he is not liable In tort as for...
전체보기 - 도서 정보

Reports of Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota, 1권

North Dakota. Supreme Court, Hiram A. Libby, Edgar Whittlesey Camp, Robert Dimon Hoskins, Robert Milligan Carothers, John McDowell Cochrane, Ames Francis Wilbur, Edwin James Taylor, Joseph Coghlan - 1891
...which does not exist. The master in the case supposed is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety when...liable in tort as for the negligence of his servant because the person suffering does not stand towards him in the relation of a stranger, but is one whose...
전체보기 - 도서 정보

Law, Labor, and Ideology in the Early American Republic

Christopher L. Tomlins - 1993 - 406 페이지
...employee's contractual assumption of the risks of his employment. The master was exempt from liability "because the implied contract of the master does not...servant against the negligence of any one but himself" (45 Mass. 49, at 60-1). * Harwell's suit had cited medical expenses of $500, which offers a different...
일부보기 - 도서 정보

Historic U.S. Court Cases: An Encyclopedia, 1권

John W. Johnson - 2001 - 1089 페이지
...exist." The chief justice maintained that the "implied contract [between the employer and employee] . . . does not extend to indemnify the servant against the negligence of any one but himself." Shaw, therefore, rejected the "different division" argument and found for the defendant railroad corporation,...
일부보기 - 도서 정보

Economic Principles of Law

Cento G. Veljanovski - 2007
...is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety . . . but because the implied contract of the master does...to indemnify the servant against the negligence of anyone but himself 74 Assop v. Yatcs (1858) 27 LJ Ex. 156; Gallagher v. Pipes (1864) LT 718. 75 Posner,...
일부보기 - 도서 정보

United States Supreme Court Reports, 44권;175-178권

United States. Supreme Court, Walter Malins Rose - 1900
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability because the servant has better means of providing for his safety, when...to indemnify the servant against the negligence of anyone but himself; and he is not liable in tort, as for the negligence of his servant, because the...
전체보기 - 도서 정보

Kansas Reports, 71권

Kansas. Supreme Court, Elliot V. Banks, William Craw Webb, Asa Maxson Fitz Randolph, Gaspar Christopher Clemens, Thomas Emmet Dewey, Llewellyn James Graham, Oscar Leopold Moore, Earl Hilton Hatcher, Howard Franklin McCue - 1906
...does not exist. The master, in the case supposed, is not exempt from liability, because the servant, has better means of providing for his safety, when he is employed in immediate connection with tbose from whose negligence he might suffer; but because the implied contract of the master does not...
전체보기 - 도서 정보




  1. 내 라이브러리
  2. 도움말
  3. 고급 도서검색
  4. ePub 다운로드
  5. PDF 다운로드