 | Edward Voigt, Charles Voigt - 1904 - 836 페이지
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were nonnegotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud, duress or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respects... | |
 | Kentucky - 1904 - 384 페이지
...to d*'ectsject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud °r illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all... | |
 | Robert Emmet Bunker, Michigan - 1905 - 392 페이지
...110 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS IN GENERAL. if it were non-negotiable.1 But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.2... | |
 | North Carolina, Thomas Brown Womack, Needham Y. Gulley, William R. Rodman - 1905 - 1412 페이지
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | Albert Sidney Bolles - 1905 - 224 페이지
...instrument is subject to the same defences as if it were non-negotiable; but a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | Michigan - 1905 - 754 페이지
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | District of Columbia - 1906 - 442 페이지
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were nonnegotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | Emilius Oviatt Randall - 1906 - 238 페이지
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | New York (State). Board of Statutory Consolidation - 1907 - 1252 페이지
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were nonnegotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
 | New Mexico - 1907 - 406 페이지
...instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any fraud or illegality affecting the instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter.... | |
| |
In the hands of any holder other than a holder in due course, a negotiable instrument is subject to the same defenses as if it were non-negotiable. But a holder who derives his title through a holder in due course, and who is not himself a party to any... 
