 | John Delatre Falconbridge - 1907 - 736 페이지
...circumstances beyond the control of the holder, and not imputable to his default, misconduct or negligence. 2. When the cause of delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made with reasonable diligence. 53 V., c. 33, s. 46. Eng. s. 46. As to causes excusing delay, cf. sec 105 (notice of dishonour) and... | |
 | Nigeria. Compilations - 1908 - 880 페이지
...control of dtlay °r nonthe holder, and not imputable to his default, misconduct, or negli- " gence. When the cause of delay ceases to operate presentment...reasonable diligence, presentment, as required by this Ordinance, cannot be effected. The fact that the holder has reason to believe that the bill will, on... | |
 | Harry Clark Bentley - 1908 - 534 페이지
...circumstances beyond the control of the holder and not imputable to his default, misconduct or negligence. When the cause of delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made with reasonable diligence." (§141.) Miscarriage in the mail is, for instance, deemed a sufficient excuse for delay8 and sickness... | |
 | John Jay Crawford - 1908 - 276 페이지
...circumstances beyond the control of the holder and not imputable to his default, misconduct or negligence (a). When the cause of delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made with reasonable diligence. miscarriage in the mail. See section 176. Sickness of the holder of the note is not an excuse for the... | |
 | Albert Hutchinson Putney - 1908 - 396 페이지
...circumstances beyond the control of the holder, and not imputable to his default, misconduct or negligence. When the cause of delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made with reasonable diligence. [WHEN DISPENSED WITH.] § 82. Presentment for payment is dispensed with : 1. When after the exercise... | |
 | Joseph Doddridge Brannan - 1908 - 276 페이지
...must be made with reasonable diligence. Sec. 82. Presentment for payment is dispensed with : — 1. Where after the exercise of reasonable diligence presentment as required by this act cannot be made ; l 2. Where the drawee is a fictitious person ; 3. By waiver of presentment, express or implied.... | |
 | John Jay Crawford - 1908 - 366 페이지
...circumstances beyond the control of the holder and not imputable to his default, misconduct or negligence (a). When the cause of delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made with reasonable diligence. (a) Windham Bank v. Norton, 22 Conn. 213; Pier v. Heinrichsoffen, 67 Mo. 163. In these cases the delay... | |
 | Albert H. Putney - 1908 - 394 페이지
...circumstances beyond the control of the holder, and not imputable to his default, misconduct or negligence. When the cause of delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made with reasonable diligence. [WHEN DISPENSED WITH.] § 82. Presentment for payment is dispensed with : 1. When after the exercise... | |
 | Joseph Doddridge Brannan, James Barr Ames, Lyman Denison Brewster, Charles Louis McKeehan - 1908 - 276 페이지
...circumstances beyond the control of the holder, and not imputable to his default, misconduct, or negligence. When the cause of delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made with reasonable diligence. Sec. 82. Presentment for payment is dispensed with: — 1. Where after the exercise of reasonable diligence... | |
 | New York (State) - 1909 - 926 페이지
...circumstances beyond the control of the holder and not imputable to his default, misconduct or negligence. When the cause of delay ceases to operate, presentment must be made with reasonable diligence. Formerly L. 1897, ch. 612, § 141. § 142. When presentment may be dispensed with. Presentment for... | |
| |
Delay in making presentment for payment is excused when the delay is caused by circumstances beyond the control of the holder, and not imputable to his default, misconduct, or negligence. When the cause of delay ceases to operate, presentment must be... 
