...may have been or how long continued, for it can only be resorted to in aid of interpretation, and ' it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation.' If there were ambiguity or doubt, then such a practice, begun so early and continued so long, would...

[ 죄송합니다. 이 페이지의 내용은 보실 수 없습니다. ]

...«maxim of interpretation equally by civilians and -by writers on international law. «Vattel says that it is not allowable to inter<pret what has no need of interpretation. If the «meaning be evident and the conclusion not ab<surd, you have no right to look beyond or «beneath...

...to the interpretation of words alleged to be libelous or slanderous. J udge Allen says (p. 601) : " It is not allowable to interpret what has no need...the words have a definite and precise meaning, to go elsewhere in search of conjecture in order to. restrict or extend the meaning. Statutes and contracts...

...introduced to be used only in case his first general rule does not apply. This proposition is that "it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation." Now, these rules of the treaty are the deliberate and careful expression of the will of the two nations...

...introduced to be used only in case his first general rule does not apply. This proposition is that "it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation." Now, these rules of the treaty are the deliberate and careful expression of the will of the two nations...

...of all in the words and language employed; and if the words are free from ambiguity and doubt, and express plainly, clearly, and distinctly the sense...allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. The statute itself furnishes the best means of its own exposition; and if the sense in which the words...

...of all in the words and language employed; and if the words aiv free from ambiguity and doubt, and express plainly, clearly, and distinctly the sense...allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. The statute itself furnishes the best means of its own exposition; and if the sense in which the words...

...of all In the words and language employed; and if the words are free from ambiguity and doubt, and express plainly, clearly, and distinctly the sense...allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. State v. Manson, 58 S. W. 319, 321, 105 Tenn. 232 (quoting Suth. St. Const p. 237, { 236). LITERARY....

...pages 244, 245, and 246, parts of which I will read: The first general maxim of interpretation is, that it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. When a deed is worded in clear and precise terms — when its meaning is evident and leads to no absurd...