 ... employed, and if the words are free from ambiguity and doubt, and express plainly, clearly and distinctly, the sense of the framers of the instrument, there is no occasion to resort to other means of interpretation. It is not allowable to interpret...  The New York Supplement - 27 페이지1915전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | Van Vechten Veeder - 1903 - 720 페이지
...introduced to be used only in case his first general rule does not apply. This proposition is that "it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation." Now, these rules of the treaty are the deliberate and careful expression of the will of the two nations... | |
 | United States. Department of the Interior - 1904 - 640 페이지
...of all in the words and language employed; and if the words are free from ambiguity and doubt, and express plainly, clearly, and distinctly the sense...allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. The statute itself furnishes the best means of its own exposition; and if the sense in which the words... | |
 | United States. Department of the Interior - 1904 - 640 페이지
...of all in the words and language employed; and if the words aiv free from ambiguity and doubt, and express plainly, clearly, and distinctly the sense...allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. The statute itself furnishes the best means of its own exposition; and if the sense in which the words... | |
 | 1904 - 980 페이지
...of all In the words and language employed; and if the words are free from ambiguity and doubt, and express plainly, clearly, and distinctly the sense...allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. State v. Manson, 58 S. W. 319, 321, 105 Tenn. 232 (quoting Suth. St. Const p. 237, { 236). LITERARY.... | |
 | International Joint Commission - 1921 - 208 페이지
...pages 244, 245, and 246, parts of which I will read: The first general maxim of interpretation is, that it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. When a deed is worded in clear and precise terms — when its meaning is evident and leads to no absurd... | |
 | Colorado. Supreme Court - 1921 - 664 페이지
...giving to the language therein used its plain meaning. No construction is required or permissible, for "it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation." In Mauff v. People,, 52 Colo. 562, 123 Pac. 101, it was held that the people of Denver in the conduct... | |
 | International Joint Commission - 1921 - 208 페이지
...maxim of interpretation equally by civilians and by writers on international law. Vattel says that it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. If the meaning be evident, and the conclusion not absurd, you have no right to look beyond or beneath... | |
 | 1925 - 1042 페이지
...may have been 'or how long continued, for it can only be resorted to in aid of interpretation, and ' it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation.' If there were ambiguity or doubt, then such a practice, begun so early and continued so long, would... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education - 1924 - 796 페이지
...may have been or how long continued, for it can only be resorted to in aid of • interpretation, and it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. If there were ambiguity or doubt, then such a practice, begun so early and continued so long, would... | |
 | United States. U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on education and labor - 1924 - 422 페이지
...departments may have been or how long continued, for it can only be resorted to in aid of interpretation, and it is not allowable to interpret what has no need of interpretation. If there were ambiguity or doubt, then such a practice, begun so early and continued so long, would... | |
| |
