...and the Congress may have concurrent authority." AVith regard to such powers, Jackson declared that "congressional inertia, indifference or quiescence...In this area, any actual test of power is likely to del>end on the imperatives of events and contemporary imponderables rather than on abstract theories...

...a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress...independent presidential responsibility. In this area and actual test of power is likely to depend on the imperatives of events and contemporary imponderables...

...a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress...Independent presidential responsibility. In this area and actual test of power is likely to depend on the Imperatives of events and contemporary imponderables...

...a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress...distribution is uncertain. Therefore, congressional inertin, indifference or quiescence may sometimes, at least as a practical matter, enable, if not invite,...

...'nnrress where the Congress has failed to enact legislation. As Mr. Jackson explained In >oui»i*«/>j/-n, "In this area any actual test of power Is likely to depend on the Imperatives of "«nt» . . . rather than on abstract theories of law." 343 TS at «37. Thus, the nature »f th» Presidential...

...£ongress where the Congress has failed to enact legislation. As Mr. Jackson explained in younastoirn. In this area any actual test of power is likely to depend on the imperatives of eie.'LtK^ ' • rather th<"l on abstract theories of law." 343 US at 637. Thus, the nature of the Presidential...

...and exorcise its powers, the President inevitably hastened to fill it. As Justice Jackson commented, "Congressional inertia, indifference or quiescence...measures on independent Presidential responsibility...."" To assert power is not, however, to legitimize it. As a Supreme Court Justice of the last century commented:...

...and exorcise its powers, the President inevitably hastened to fill it. As Justice Jackson commented, "Congressional inertia, indifference or quiescence...measures on independent Presidential responsibility...."" To assert power is not, -however, to legitimize it. As a Supreme Court Justice of the last century...

...Co. v. Sawyer, supra, at 637, Justice Jackson suggested that presidential action sometimes occurs in "a zone of twilight in which he and Congress may have...authority, or in which its distribution is uncertain." In those circumstances, even in the absence of any Congressional grant or denial of authority, presidential...

...a congressional grant or denial of authority, he can only rely upon his own independent powers, but there is a zone of twilight in which he and Congress...sometimes, at least as a practical matter, enable, if>not invite, measures on independent presidential responsibility. In this area, any actual test of...