 | District of Columbia - 1902 - 386 페이지
...parties prior to the latter. Sec. 1363. WHAT PRESUMPTION WHEN TRANSFEREE'S TITLE SHOWN DEFECTIVE. — Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound... | |
 | Ohio - 1902
...1 73^. [Who deemed holder in crue course.] Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in die course; but when it is shown that the title of any...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound... | |
 | John Jay Crawford - 1902 - 173 페이지
...deemed holder in due course.—Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course (a) ; but when it is shown that the title of any person...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course (&). But the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became... | |
 | John Warwick Daniel, Charles Alexander Douglass - 1903
...instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter. § 98. Who deemed holder in due course. — Every holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound... | |
 | James Smith McMaster - 1903
...instrument for the full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon." By section 98 it is provided: " Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course." It is evident from these provisions that the 'Legislature did not intend to... | |
 | Idaho - 1903
...instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the later. SEC. 59. Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound... | |
 | James Webster Eaton, Frank Bixby Gilbert - 1903 - 767 페이지
...course; burden of proof. a. Statutory provision.— The Negotiable Instruments Law provides that: " Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...holder to prove that he or some person under whom he •60 NW 79; Matson v. Alley, 102, 36 Am. Dec. 738; Smith v. His141 11l. 284, 31 NE 419; Howell cock,... | |
 | Maryland - 1904
...holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter. Black v. Bank of Westminster, 96 Md. 416. 78. Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims, acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound... | |
 | Edward Voigt, Charles Voigt - 1904 - 800 페이지
...re-purchases it from him or a subsequent holder, he is not protected. Burden of proof as to title.— Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...some person under whom he claims acquired the title in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound on the... | |
 | Charles Monfort Lindsay - 1904 - 174 페이지
...Course; Burden of Proof. — Every holder is deemed primes facie to be a holder in due course (a) ; but when it is shown that the title of any person...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course (6). But the lastmentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became... | |
| |
Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course ; but when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated the instrument was defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that he or some person under whom he claims acquired... 
