 | North Carolina, Thomas Brown Womack, Needham Y. Gulley, William R. Rodman - 1905
...holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter. 1899, c. 733. s. 58. 2208. Deemed prima facie in due course. Every holder is deemed prima facie...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound... | |
 | Michigan - 1905
...instrument, has all the rights of such former holder in respect of all parties prior to the latter. SEC. 61. Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound... | |
 | Robert Emmet Bunker - 1905 - 299 ÆäÀÌÁö
...Holder in due course; who deemed.— Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder in due course,1 but when it is shown that the title of any person...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course.2 But the last mentioned rule does not apply in THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW.... | |
 | American Bar Association - 1905
...(Crawf., s. 98), when it is shown that the title of any person who has negotiated an instrument is defective, the burden is on the holder to prove that...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. This case affirms what was the law in Iowa before the adoption of the Negotiable... | |
 | Emilius Oviatt Randall - 1906 - 200 ÆäÀÌÁö
...sale the seller acted as the indorser's agent. Pease v. McClelland, 4 OFD 82. (1866.) 3173d (4956) [Who Deemed Holder in Due Course.] Every holder is...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound... | |
 | District of Columbia - 1906 - 396 ÆäÀÌÁö
...parties prior to the latter. Sec. 1363. WHAT PRESUMPTION WHEN TRANSFEREE'S TITLE SHOWN DEFECTIVE. — Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound... | |
 | Robert Emmet Bunker - 1906 - 682 ÆäÀÌÁö
...instrument for the full amount thereof against all parties liable thereon." "By section 98 it is provided: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course." It is evident from these provisions that the Legislature did not intend to... | |
 | North Carolina. Supreme Court - 1907
...plaintiff, as stated hy the Court, but on the defendant. By sec. 2208 of said ch. 54 it is enacted: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course. But the last-mentioned rule does not apply in favor of a party who became bound... | |
 | 1907
...declared by the courts, was incorporated into the negotiable Instrument law at ¡× 1676-29, In these words: "Every holder is deemed prima facie to be a holder...person under whom he claims acquired the title as a holder in due course." Counsel for appellant freely concede that the mere crediting of the consideration... | |
| |