 Why, Sir, if you were to read Richardson for the story, your impatience would be so much fretted that you would hang yourself. But you must read him for the sentiment, and consider the story as only giving occasion to the sentiment.  The Life of Samuel Johnson - 94 페이지저자: James Boswell - 1889전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | William Forsyth - 1871 - 388 페이지
...Erskine remarked to him, as well he might, " Surely, sir, Richardson is very tedious/' Johnson answered, "Why, sir, if you were to read Richardson for the story, your impatience would be so much fretted that you would hang yourself; but you must read him for the sentiment,... | |
 | John Forster - 1873 - 806 페이지
...outcasts.* Admiramuch the worse, I would ask leave to say, for Richardson.) "Sir, there is "more knowledge of the heart in one "letter of Richardson's, than in all Tom " Jon.ee ! I, indeed, never read Joseph "Andrews." EKSKINF, : "Surely, sir, " Richardson is very tedious."... | |
 | James Boswell - 1874 - 602 페이지
...not known who Fielding was, he should have believed he was an ostler. Sir, there is more knowledge of the heart in one letter of Richardson's, than in...if you were to read Richardson for the story, your impatience would be so much fretted, that you would hang yourself. But you must read him for the sentiment,... | |
 | ALEXANDER MAIN - 1874 - 484 페이지
...not known who Fielding was, he should have believed he was an ostler. Sir, there is more knowledge of the heart in one letter of Richardson's, than in...'Tom Jones.' I, indeed, never read 'Joseph Andrews.' —• HONOURABLE THOMAS ERSKINE : " Surely, Sir, Richardson is very tedious."—JOHNSON : " Why, Sir,... | |
 | Alexander Main - 1874 - 482 페이지
...not known who Fielding was, he should have believed l1e was an ostler. Sir, there is more knowledge of the heart in one letter of Richardson's, than in...'Tom Jones.' I, indeed, never read 'Joseph Andrews.' — HONOURABLE THOMAS ERSKINE : " Surely, Sir, Richardson is very tedious." — JOHNSON : " Why, Sir,... | |
 | Lal Behari Day - 1874 - 502 페이지
...that novelist was tedious. " Why, sir, if you were to read Eichardson for the story, your impatience would be so much fretted, that you would hang yourself; but you must read him for the sentiment, arid consider the story as only giving occasion to the sentiment." I should be very sorry, indeed,... | |
 | Alexander Main - 1874 - 480 페이지
...not known who Fielding was, he should have believed he was an ostler. Sir, there is more knowledge of the heart in one letter of Richardson's, than in all 'Tom Jones.' I, indeed, never read 'Joseph Andrews.'—HONOURABLE THOMAS ERSKINE : "Surely, Sir, Richardson is very tedious."—JOHNSON : " Why,... | |
 | Lal Behari Day - 1874 - 314 페이지
...Richardson, gave the follow~ ing reply to Thomas Erskine, who had remarked that that novelist was tedious. " Why, sir, if you were to read Richardson for the story, your impatience would be so much fretted, that you would hang yourself; but you must read him for the sentiment,... | |
 | Lal Behari Day - 1874 - 410 페이지
...Richardson, gave the following reply to Thomas Brskine, who had remarked that that novelist was tedious. " Why, sir, if you were to read Richardson for the story, your impatience would be so much fretted, that you would hang yourself; but you must read him for the sentiment,... | |
 | John Forster - 1877 - 468 페이지
...heart in one letter of Richard" son's, than in all Tom Jones ! I, indeed, never read Joseph A ndmes? ERSKINE : " Surely, sir, Richardson is very tedious."...you were to read " Richardson for the story, your impatience would be so much fretted that you " would hang yourself. But you must read him for the sentiment."... | |
| |
