 | Robert Justin Lipkin - 2000 - 392 페이지
...commerce among the states was plenary. Consider Marshall's words: "If, as has always been understood, the sovereignty of congress, though limited to specified...over commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, is vested in congress as absolutely as it would be in a single government, having in... | |
 | Jay M. Feinman - 2000 - 380 페이지
...commerce. The final step was to define "regulate." Marshall determined that "This power, like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be...limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution itself." Thus the Court concluded that Congress had constitutional authority to regulate commercial... | |
 | Robert J. Spitzer - 2000 - 300 페이지
...reserved to the states, 93 and, as Marshall stated in Gibbons v Ogden, each of Congress's delegated powers "is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost...limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution." 94 Hammer v Dagenhart was directly at odds with Marshall's position. It rested on the view that Congress... | |
 | Charles R. Geisst - 2000 - 376 페이지
...involved. But the Supreme Court disagreed. In 1824 Marshall wrote that the power of the commerce clause was "complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost...acknowledges no limitations, other than are prescribed in the Constitution."13 The Fulton monopoly was broken, interstate transportation was given an immediate boost.... | |
 | William Z. Ripley - 2000 - 440 페이지
...established. The power of Congress to regulate commerce among the several states is supreme and plenary. It is " complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost...extent, and acknowledges no limitations, other than arc prescribed in the Constitution." Gibbons v. Of/den, 9 Wheat. 1, 196, 6 L. ed. 23, 70. The conviction... | |
 | R. Kent Newmyer - 2001 - 552 페이지
...limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution. ... If, as has always been understood, the sovereignty of congress, though limited to specified...over commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, is vested in congress as absolutely as it would be in a single government." 59 Marshall... | |
 | R. Kent Newmyer - 2001 - 552 페이지
...left no ground for doubt or compromise, or so it seemed: "This power [over commerce], like all others vested in congress, is complete in itself, may be...limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution. ... If, as has always been understood, the sovereignty of congress, though limited to specified objects,... | |
| |
Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 196, 6 L. ed. 23, 70, where he said: "We are now arrived at the inquiry, What is this power? It is the power to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed. This power, like all others vested... 
