 restraint of trade" at common law and in the law of this country at the time of the adoption of the antitrust act only embraced acts or contracts or agreements or combinations which operated to the prejudice of the public interests by unduly restricting...  The New York Supplement - 481 페이지1915전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | State Bar Association of Wisconsin - 1912 - 468 페이지
...its reach by a too narrow and unreasonable adherence to the strict letter." So interpreted, the law "only embraced acts or contracts or agreements or...effect, or because of the evident purpose of the acts, and so forth, injuriously restrain trade." But it does not "forbid or restrain the power to make normal... | |
 | 1944 - 474 페이지
[ 죄송합니다. 이 페이지의 내용은 보실 수 없습니다. ] | |
 | 1949 - 1220 페이지
[ 죄송합니다. 이 페이지의 내용은 보실 수 없습니다. ] | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1949 - 154 페이지
...namely, that the standard of legality was the absence or presence of prejudice to the public interest by unduly restricting competition or unduly obstructing the due course of trade. In Fed. Trade Comm's v. Sinclair Co (261 US 463, 476), referring to the Clayton Act and the Federal... | |
 | W. P. Frank - 1950 - 484 페이지
[ 죄송합니다. 이 페이지의 내용은 보실 수 없습니다. ] | |
| |
