 It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the...  American Law Reports Annotated - 519 페이지1925전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - 1893 - 812 페이지
...natural and probable sequence of the negligence or the wrongful act, and that it was such as might, or ought to, have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. But this rule is no test in cases where no intervening efficient cause is found between the original... | |
 | 1893 - 1172 페이지
...case. To warrant a jury in finding that negligence Is the proximate cause of the Injury It must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that It ought to have been foreseen In the light of the attending circumstances. Railway Co. v.... | |
 | Austin Abbott - 1894 - 626 페이지
...negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." The court further say: " We do not say that even the natural and probable consequences of a wrongful... | |
 | William Francis Bailey - 1894 - 674 페이지
...negligence or an act amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence...foreseen, in the light of the attending circumstances. We do not say that even the natural and probable consequences of a wrongful act or omission are in... | |
 | 1894 - 1280 페이지
...negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, Is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence...wrongful act, and that It ought to have been foreseen hi the light of the attending circumstances." The court further say: "We do not say that even the natural... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1894 - 1026 페이지
...negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it was such as might or ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." On page... | |
 | Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - 1894 - 704 페이지
...case. To warrant a jury in finding that negligence is the proximate cause of the injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. Railway Co. v.... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1894 - 1070 페이지
...natural. and probable sequence of the negligence or the wrongful act, iw and that it was such as might, or ought to, have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances. But this rule la no test in cases where no intervening efficient cause is found between the original... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1895 - 776 페이지
...negligence, or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of the injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence...foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances." He states further: "We do not say that even the natural and probable consequences of a wrongful act... | |
 | 1897 - 830 페이지
...negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong, is the proximate cause of the injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence...foreseen, in the light of the attending circumstances." In Hoagf. Railroad Co., 85 Pa. St. 293, 298, 299, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania said : "The true... | |
| |
