...character of the business and not independent of the relation of master and servant. It needs not to have been foreseen or expected, but after the event it must appear to have had its origin in the risk connected with the employment, and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence....

...incidental to the character of the business and not independent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected, but after...flowed from that source as a rational consequence. The exact words to be interpreted are found in the English workmen's compensation act, and doubtless came...

...between the conditions under which the work is required to be performed and the resulting injury." " It need not have been foreseen or expected, but after...flowed from that source as a rational consequence." ' Thus, while the employer would clearly be liable for injury caused by an accidental explosion in...

...incidental to the character of the business and not independent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected, but after...and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence.1 1 Accord: Weckes v. W. Stead & Co., 30 TLR 586 (CA Eng. 1914), dependents of a foreman,...

...business and not independent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen nor expected but after the event it must appear to have...employment, and to have flowed from that source, as a natural consequence." And the injury occurs in the course of employment when the workman is doing the...

...crime of the highest magnitude, yet now, after the event, it appears to have had its origin in a hazard connected with the employment and to have flowed from that source as a rational consequence. Tried by the test suggested in McNicol's case, 215 Mass. 407, 499, the injury seems to have arisen...

...incidental to the character of the business and not independent of the relation of master and servant It need not have been foreseen or expected, but after...flowed from that source as a rational consequence." In Bryant v. Fissell, 84 NJ Law, 72, 86 Atl. 458, it was said: "To warrant a recovery, it must appear...

...incidental to the character of the business and not independent of the relation of master and servant. It need not have been foreseen or expected but after...flowed from that source as a rational consequence." 5. Since it appears that Hewitt started at about 10 PM on the night of September 23 to ride from Taunton,...

...incidental to his employment." 1. To be within the Workmen's Compensation Act an injury to an employee must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected...flowed from that source as a rational consequence. 2. The claimant, an employee in a rubber tire factory whose duties did not require him to use or come...

...Injury incidental to employment. 3. To be within the Workmen's Compensation Act an injury to an employee must appear to have had its origin in a risk connected...flowed from that source as a rational consequence. Federal Rubber M. Co. v. Havolic, 341 4. The claimant, an employee in a rubber tire factory whose duties...