 ... husband and wife being considered as one person in law, they cannot take the estate by moieties, but both are seised of the entirety, per tout, et non per my; the consequence of which is, that neither the husband nor the wife can dispose of any part...  The Southwestern Reporter - 69 페이지1918전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | William Blackstone - 1872 - 776 페이지
...moieties, but both are seised of the entirety, per tout, et non per my : the consequence of which is, that neither the husband nor the wife can dispose of any...other, but the whole must remain to the survivor, (k) (6) ffj Jbid. t 278. (g) По. Litt. 188. (h) Dyer 340. l Вер. 101. (i) Litt. $ 288. 5 Rep.... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1873 - 622 페이지
...moieties, but both are siezed of the entirety per tout, et non per my, the consequence of which is, that neither the husband nor the wife can dispose of any...other, but the whole ^ must remain to the survivor." LEWIS, CJ, in Stuckey v. Kcefe's Ex'rs, 26 Pa. St. 399, defines this peculiar estate as follows: "A... | |
 | Joel Prentiss Bishop - 1878 - 790 페이지
...moieties, but both are seised of the entirety, per tout, et non per my ; the consequence of which is, that neither the husband nor the wife can dispose of any...other, but the whole must remain to the survivor," 1 thus creating, to appearance at least, an equality between the two grantees. § 614. The present... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1873 - 636 페이지
...of the entircty, per tout et non per my. The consequence of which is, that neither the husband nor wife can dispose of any part, without the assent of the other, but the whole remains to the survivor. 3 Bl. Com. 181. And if a grant is made to husband and wife and a third person,... | |
 | Marcus Tullius Hun - 1885 - 780 페이지
...by moieties, but both are seized of the entirety ; the consequence ot which is that neither of them can dispose of any part without the assent of the other, but the whole goes to the survivor." (Id., 115.) And it has since been sustained by the following additional authorities... | |
 | Henry Foulks Lynch - 1874 - 460 페이지
...entirety, but cannot take the estate by moieties: the consequence of this is that neither husband nor wife can dispose of any part without the assent of the other. If land should be given to A. and B., man and vnfe, and their heirs, what would their estate be called... | |
 | 1875 - 722 페이지
...statute. Wag. Stat. p. 1352, § i2. They are both seized of the entirety/ir tout et non per my. Neither can dispose of any part without the assent of the other, but the whole remains to the survivor. Co. Litt. 187; Bl. Com. 182; i Cowan, 95; 8 Ib. 277 ; 16 Johns, no. So that,... | |
 | John Barbee Minor - 1877 - 1150 페이지
...common, they are said to be seised by entireties; but iu consequence of their legal oneness, neither can dispose of any part without the assent of the other, but the whole m.ust remain at common law to the survivor. (1 Steph. Com. 314-'15; 1 Th. Co. Lit, 739-'40, & n (L); Thornton v.... | |
 | William A. Shinn - 1878 - 640 페이지
...are seized of the entirety, per tout, and not per my. Neither can dispose of any part of the estate without the assent of the other, but the whole must remain to the survivor." The court in the same ease decides that the statute has not changed this common law rule, but has expressly... | |
 | William Blackstone, Alexander Leith, James Frederick Smith - 1880 - 650 페이지
...non per my : the consequence of which is, that neither the husband nor the wife can dispose in fee of any part without the assent of the other, but the whole must remain to the survivor. ' This rule is not varied by the RSO c. 105, s. 11 (6).' . Upon these principles, of a thorough and... | |
| |
