 A person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law. That is only one of the forms of municipal law, and is no more sacred than any other.  The Pacific Reporter - 154 페이지1916전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | Eric T. Freyfogle - 2007 - 220 페이지
...of state laws regulating grain elevators: A person has no property, no vested right, in any rule of common law. That is only one of the forms of municipal law, and it is no more sacred than any other. Rights of property which have been created by the common law cannot... | |
 | 1912 - 830 페이지
...everywhere. (Davis v. Mills, 194 US, 451, 457)." In Munn v. Illinois (94 US, 113, 134) the court said: "A person has no property, no vested interest in any...property which have been created by the common law can not be taken away without due process; but the law itself, as a rule of conduct, may be changed... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1654 페이지
...process forbids the alteration of common law tort causes of action, the Supreme Court declared that "a person has no property, no vested interest in any...municipal law and is no more sacred than any other." The even more drastic Longshoremen's & Harbor Workers' Compensation Act of 1927, which totally abolished... | |
 | New York (State). Department of Labor - 1910 - 480 페이지
...94 US 113, 134, quoted with approval in Hurtado v. California, 110 US 516, 532, it was held that " a person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law. * * * Eights of property, which have been created by the common law, cannot be taken away without due... | |
| |
