| Martin Calder - 2003 - 316 페이지
...name: Tis but thy name that is my enemy: Thou art thyself, though not a Montague. What's Montague? 1t is nor hand, nor foot. Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part Belonging to a man. O be some other name! What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other... | |
| Luigi Jannuzzi - 2004 - 88 페이지
...I hear more, or shall I speak at this? JULIET. Tis but thy name that is my enemy; Thou art thyself, though not a Montague. What's Montague? It is nor...hand, nor foot. Nor arm. nor face, nor any other part belonging to a man. O, be some other name! (Lights only on JULIE.) What's in a name? That which we... | |
| Laurie Maguire - 2003 - 260 페이지
...these lines, but another name. Even as Juliet is disassociating Romeo from Montague ("Thou art thyself, though not a Montague. / What's Montague? It is nor...hand nor foot, / Nor arm nor face, nor any other part / Belonging to a man"; 2.2.339-42), even as she is avowing that names are irrelevant ("What's in a... | |
| Paula Marantz Cohen - 2004 - 289 페이지
...on her heart as she recited the famous lines: "Pis but thy name that is my enemy. Thou are thyself, though not a Montague. What's Montague? It is nor hand, nor foot, Nor arm, nor face. (Here, Stephanie gestured to each of the bodily parts enumerated in what she took to be an original... | |
| Gustavo Bernardo - 2004 - 282 페이지
...Shakespeare2: 38]: 'T is but thy name, that is my enemy: Thou art thyself though, not a Montague. What s Montague? It is nor hand, nor foot, Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part Belonging to a man. O! be some other name. What 's in a name? That which we call a rose, By any other... | |
| 2005 - 531 페이지
...Juliette à Roméo à l'Acte II, scène 2 : « Tis but thy name that is my enemy ; / Thou art thyself, though not a Montague. / What's Montague ? it is nor...nor foot, / Nor arm , nor face, nor any other part / Belonging to a man. O be some other name ! / What's in a name ? that which we call a rose / By any... | |
| Nicholas Brooke - 2005 - 240 페이지
...(Freudian-wise, as Professor Mahood has shown) promote the quibbling thrust continually through it : What's Montague ? It is nor hand, nor foot, Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part Belonging to a man. O, be some other name! (II. ii. 40-2) The unnamed 'part' on which her fancy rests... | |
| James Zager, William Shakespeare - 2005 - 70 페이지
...(Reading:) 'Tis but thy name that is my enemy; Thou art thyself, though not a Montague. ROMEO. (Reading:) What's Montague? It is nor hand nor foot, Nor arm nor face, nor any other part Belonging to a man! NURSE. Nor any other part belonging to a man?! O, be some other name! JULIET. What's... | |
| Peggy Kamuf - 2005 - 386 페이지
...between Romeo and his name a blade sharpened by her desire for that which cannot be named: What's a Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot, Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part Belonging to a man. . . . . . . Romeo, doff thy name; And for that name, which is no part of thee,... | |
| William Shakespeare - 2000 - 180 페이지
...Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo?" Since the eighteenth century, the standard modern text has read, What's Montague? It is nor hand, nor foot, Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part Belonging to a man. O be some other name! What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other... | |
| |