 | 1860 - 268 페이지
...meaning, and that it was mainly hased upon a mistaken statement of fact — the statement in the opinion that "the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." An inspection of the Constitution wdl ahcpr that the right of property in a slave is not distinctly... | |
 | 1860 - 138 페이지
...meaning, and that it was mainly based upon ji mistaken statement of fact — the statement in the opinion that " the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." An inspection of the Constitution will show that the right of property in a slave is not distinctly... | |
 | William Dean Howells - 1860 - 414 페이지
...meaning ; and that it was mainly based upon a mistaken statement of fact — the statement in the opinion that "the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution/' An inspection of the Constitution will show that the right of property in a slave is not distinctly... | |
 | Richard Josiah Hinton - 1860 - 326 페이지
...meaning ; and that was mainly based upon a mistaken statement of fact, — the statement in the opinion that " the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." SLAVES CONSIDERED AS PERSONS AND NOT AS PROPERTY. An inspection of the Constitution will show that... | |
 | Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Arnold Douglas - 1860 - 348 페이지
...being the supreme law, no constitution or law can interfere with it. It being affirmed in the decision that the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution, the conclusion inevitably follows that no State law or constitution can destroy that right. I then... | |
 | 1860 - 266 페이지
...meaning, and that it was mainly based upon a mistaken statement of fact — the statement in the opinion that " the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." An inspection of the Constitution will show that the right of property in a slave is not distinctly... | |
 | David W. Bartlett - 1860 - 368 페이지
...meaning, and that it was mainly based upon a mistaken statement of fact — the statement in the opinion that " the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." An inspection of the Constitution will show that the right of property in a slave is not distinctly... | |
 | James Dunwoody Brownson De Bow, R. G. Barnwell, Edwin Bell, William MacCreary Burwell - 1860 - 756 페이지
...property — in slaves as in everything else in which property may be had. For the court decided, " The right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." " And if the Constitution recognizes the right of property of the master in a slave, and make no distinction... | |
 | David W. Bartlett - 1860 - 356 페이지
...right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution." I repeat it, " The right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution!" What is it to be "affirmed" in the Constitution'? Made firm in the Constitution — so made that it... | |
 | James Washington Sheahan - 1860 - 562 페이지
...say : " K <; w as we have already said in an earlier part of this opinion, upon a differenl point, the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution. . . . And if the Constitution recognizes the right of property of the master in a slave, and mokes... | |
| |
... the right of property in a slave is distinctly and expressly affirmed in the Constitution. 
