 A person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law. That is only one of the forms of municipal law, and is no more sacred than any other.  The Pacific Reporter - 154 페이지1916전체보기 - 도서 정보
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1974 - 1586 페이지
...(1876), which involved legislative changes in the regulation of a trade. Chief Justice Waite said: "A person has no property, no vested interest, in...property which have been created by the common law can not be taken away without due process; but the law itself, as a rule of conduct, may be changed... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce - 1975 - 668 페이지
...the leading earlier cases, Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 113, 134, (1876) where Chief Justice Waite said : A person has no property, no vested interest, in any...other. Rights of property which have been created cannot be taken away without due process; but the laic itself, as a rule of conduct, may be changed... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1975 - 960 페이지
...leading earlier < -¡i»^. Munn \. Illinois, 94 US 113, 134 (1876), where Chief Justice Waite said : "A person has no property, no vested interest, in...other. Rights of property which have been created cannot be taken away without due process ; but the law itself, as a rule of conduct, may Ite changed... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1981 - 244 페이지
...R. Co. v. White, 243 US 188, 37 S.Ct. 247, 61 L.Ed. 32. Our cases have clearly established thai "la] person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law." Second Employers' Liability Cases. 223 US 1. 50. 32 S Ct 169. 175. 56 L Ed 327 (191 I), quoting Munn... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1891 - 652 페이지
...quoting further from the able opinion of the late Chief Justice of the United States in the Munn case: " A person has no property, no vested interest, in any...no more sacred than any other. Rights of property that have been created by the common law cannot be taken away without due process; but the law itself,... | |
 | Richard A. Epstein - 1985 - 380 페이지
...equivocated on the question of whether any quid pro quo was required, given its own precedents that ''[a] person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law" that has already been considered and rejected.27 But it then addressed the matter in detail, consistent... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1985 - 1086 페이지
...action serves sufficiently important public interests. See Munn v. Illinois, 94 US 113, 134 (1877) ("A person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law. . . . Indeed, the great office of statutes is to remedy defects in the common law as they are developed,... | |
 | John E. H. Sherry - 1993 - 952 페이지
...v. Stafford, 226 Cal. App. 2d 31, 37 Cal. Rptr. 681. "In Lawman, supra, the court stated: 'Although rights of property which have been created by the...common law cannot be taken away without due process, the law itself, as a rule of conduct, may be changed at will by the Legislature. ..."... It may create... | |
 | John Rogers Commons - 434 페이지
...foreshadowed a different view when it said that, while the common law furnishes forms of procedure, "a person has no property, no vested interest, in...municipal law, and is no more sacred than any other." 1 But in the case of Hurtado r. California, in 1884, the question was whether a state legislature could... | |
| |
